From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51515)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1adT1j-0001Tw-Gz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:35:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1adT1e-0006qo-TH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:35:03 -0500
Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=48366 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1adT1e-0006pV-Eh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:34:58 -0500
References: <1457320380-5111-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-7+pZFO6_p-w_95BB1fmU9hVdV-Z6V_xqyqOfOQ+ktgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<56DE802F.2060502@redhat.com> <56DE8436.60304@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<56DE859B.8020404@redhat.com> <56DE9630.5020109@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<CAFEAcA8_cnxjT7Yh7TgD9BR28PUb8Z6AXKpVMFhadwbwtMXOaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <56DF7E07.60803@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:36:07 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8_cnxjT7Yh7TgD9BR28PUb8Z6AXKpVMFhadwbwtMXOaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/14] Net patches
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 03/08/2016 05:54 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 16:06, Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> I found the reason for this problem is that
>> unix_connect() have not connect to sock_path before iov_send().
>> It need time to establish connection. so can we fix it with usleep()
>> like this:
>>
>>     recv_sock = unix_connect(sock_path, NULL);
>>     g_assert_cmpint(recv_sock, !=, -1);
>> +    usleep(1000);
>>
>>     ret = iov_send(send_sock[0], iov, 2, 0, sizeof(size) +
>> sizeof(send_buf));
>>     g_assert_cmpint(ret, ==, sizeof(send_buf) + sizeof(size));
>>     close(send_sock[0]);
>>
>>     ret = qemu_recv(recv_sock, &len, sizeof(len), 0);
> 
> I would prefer it if we could find a way to fix this race
> reliably rather than just inserting a delay and hoping it
> is sufficient. Otherwise the test is likely to be unreliable
> if run on a heavily loaded or slow machine.

Yes, but there is no way to know when tcp_chr_accept() is called. Add a event
to notify it?

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
> 
>