From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mempool: add in the RTE_NEXT_ABI for
 ABI breakages
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:39:38 +0000
Message-ID: <56E051CA.8020105@intel.com>
References: <1455634095-4183-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1457517037-71693-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1457517037-71693-5-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <56DFFF06.3080209@redhat.com> <56E00971.8040905@intel.com>
 <56E03A60.6010807@6wind.com> <56E04F3E.9020503@intel.com>
 <56E04FDB.4070100@6wind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1BA567D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  9 Mar 2016 17:39:42 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <56E04FDB.4070100@6wind.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Olivier,

On 3/9/2016 4:31 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 03/09/2016 05:28 PM, Hunt, David wrote:
>
>> Sure, v4 will remove the NEXT_ABI patch , and replace it with just the
>> ABI break announcement for 16.07. For anyone who what's to try out the
>> patch, they can always get it from patchwork, but not as part 16.04.
> I think it's better to have the deprecation notice in a separate
> mail, outside of the patch series, so Thomas can just apply this
> one and let the series pending for 16.07.
>
> Thanks,
> Olivier

Yes, sure, makes perfect sense.

Thanks,
David.