From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Problems with perl 5.22
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:00:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E19A2B.60002@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E219D57B-2F63-40DE-9C33-161AE6F738CC@gmail.com>
On 2016-03-10 16:54, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>
>> Am 10.03.2016 um 06:13 schrieb Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>:
>>
>> I'm working on a package (amanda - the Advanced Maryland Archiving
>> system) that is written heavily in perl with swig interfaces to C.
>> This code ran great until the update to perl 5.22; it now dies a
>> horrible death on almost every activity. These failures seem to
>> always be in the swig generated wrappers, but that may just be
>> where most of the work gets done.
>>
>> I've narrowed this down to exactly the change to perl 5.22 from
>> 5.20. Using bisect as well as experimentation (e.g. trying all
>> the compiler combinations that have occurred since a last good
>> version) and I can go from working to failing by only the change
>> in perl.
>>
>> The interesting (scary) thing is that I've built amanda for my
>> target natively on my board running debian, including perl 5.22.
>> This means I can't say definitively that perl 5.22 is the culprit
>> as on debian it runs fine. So, it's got something to do with the
>> OE environment/porting/packaging of perl and not just the revision.
>>
>> I've also tested this on multiple architectures (ARM, PowerPC) with
>> the same results - with perl 5.20 amanda works, with perl 5.22 it fails.
>>
>> I've compared the actual 5.22.1 sources used by OE-core and debian
>> and they are subtly different, although I can't pinpoint any change
>> that might be responsible.
>>
>> For the moment, I can just fall back to perl 5.20 for my target
>> that needs to run amanda, but this isn't a real solution (e.g.
>> in this state I can't propose my recipe to any layer as it's
>> totally broken with the current OE-core). I'd like to see this
>> fixed but the amanda code (swig wrappers) are horribly complex
>> which makes debugging quite the challenge, not to mention they
>> may be about the only way to uncover the bug, whether it's in
>> amanda or perl.
>>
>> Any suggestions on how to move forward?
>
> Since I have no clue what's wrong and how it fails (backtrace
> would point in some directions), several ideas might work:
The problem here is that the failures happen in the swig generated
files which are very difficult to debug (and don't really track
in the -dbg packages)
>
> How clean is your build location (we realize that often between
> updates some files remain in our target images until we wipe
> tmp/ - cleansstate for image doesn't help ...)?
100% clean, I've started from scratch many times
>
> Did you prove the library path's of your *.so's? Perl does
> almost everything within libperl.so - build against wrong version
> causes in weird crashes (scan DBI mailing list for admin's
> build issues of DBI on AIX/HP-UX ...).
As I said, this all works fine when I build [from scratch] with
perl-5.20 and not [from scratch] with perl 5.22
>
> Maybe share your recipe can help to reproduce the problem
> elsewhere and debug locally.
>
I'd be happy to share, perhaps privately if you're inclined?
It's a complicated setup and testing can be a bit tedious, but
I'm happy for any help.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 5:13 Problems with perl 5.22 Gary Thomas
2016-03-10 15:54 ` Jens Rehsack
2016-03-10 16:00 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2016-03-10 18:51 ` Stephen Arnold
2016-03-11 7:21 ` Khem Raj
2016-03-15 8:00 ` Gary Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E19A2B.60002@mlbassoc.com \
--to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=rehsack@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.