All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "\"Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑\"" <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Minoru Usui <min-usui@ti.jp.nec.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:10:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E23729.2000702@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BE691E4CBA06214BB0FA8EEFC7C61A4D0182622F@BPXM02GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>

Hi Minoru,

Thanks for testing it.

-- 
Thanks
Zhou

On 03/11/2016 11:03 AM, Minoru Usui wrote:
> Hi, Zhou
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kexec [mailto:kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of "Zhou, Wenjian/周文?"
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:01 AM
>> To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Do you have any comments ?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Zhou
>>
>> On 03/09/2016 08:27 AM, Zhou Wenjian wrote:
>>> v4:
>>>           1. fix a bug caused by the logic
>
> Thank you for your work.
>
> I tested your v4 patch in 5GB dump file over 12000 times,
> outputted dumpfile did not be broken.
>
> And I measured performance of it.
> I think there is no problem.
>
> [-d31]
> num-thread    real     vs num-threads 0
> ----------------------------------------
>    0           11.913      100.0%
>    1            8.385       70.4%
>    2            4.849       40.7%
>    4            3.100       26.0%
>    8            2.286       19.2%
>
> [-d0]
> num-thread    real     vs num-threads 0
> ----------------------------------------
>    0          221.968      100.0%
>    1          157.433       70.9%
>    2           86.679       39.1%
>    4           71.892       32.4%
>    8           37.034       16.7%
>
> Thanks
> Minoru Usui
>
>>> v3:
>>>           1. remove some unused variables
>>>           2. fix a bug caused by the wrong logic
>>>           3. fix a bug caused by optimising
>>>           4. improve more performance by using Minoru Usui's code
>>>
>>> multi-threads implementation will introduce extra cost when handling
>>> each page. The origin implementation will also do the extra work for
>>> filtered pages. So there is a big performance degradation in
>>> --num-threads -d 31.
>>> The new implementation won't do the extra work for filtered pages any
>>> more. So the performance of -d 31 is close to that of serial processing.
>>>
>>> The new implementation is just like the following:
>>>           * The basic idea is producer producing page and consumer writing page.
>>>           * Each producer have a page_flag_buf list which is used for storing
>>>             page's description.
>>>           * The size of page_flag_buf is little so it won't take too much memory.
>>>           * And all producers will share a page_data_buf array which is
>>>             used for storing page's compressed data.
>>>           * The main thread is the consumer. It will find the next pfn and write
>>>             it into file.
>>>           * The next pfn is smallest pfn in all page_flag_buf.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Minoru Usui <min-usui@ti.jp.nec.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wenjian <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>>    makedumpfile.c | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>    makedumpfile.h |  35 ++++---
>>>    2 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>>> index fa0b779..2b0864a 100644
>>> --- a/makedumpfile.c
>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
>>> @@ -3483,7 +3483,8 @@ initial_for_parallel()
>>>    	unsigned long page_data_buf_size;
>>>    	unsigned long limit_size;
>>>    	int page_data_num;
>>> -	int i;
>>> +	struct page_flag *current;
>>> +	int i, j;
>>>
>>>    	len_buf_out = calculate_len_buf_out(info->page_size);
>>>
>>> @@ -3560,10 +3561,16 @@ initial_for_parallel()
>>>
>>>    	limit_size = (get_free_memory_size()
>>>    		      - MAP_REGION * info->num_threads) * 0.6;
>>> +	if (limit_size < 0) {
>>> +		MSG("Free memory is not enough for multi-threads\n");
>>> +		return FALSE;
>>> +	}
>>>
>>>    	page_data_num = limit_size / page_data_buf_size;
>>> +	info->num_buffers = 3 * info->num_threads;
>>>
>>> -	info->num_buffers = MIN(NUM_BUFFERS, page_data_num);
>>> +	info->num_buffers = MAX(info->num_buffers, NUM_BUFFERS);
>>> +	info->num_buffers = MIN(info->num_buffers, page_data_num);
>>>
>>>    	DEBUG_MSG("Number of struct page_data for produce/consume: %d\n",
>>>    			info->num_buffers);
>>> @@ -3588,6 +3595,36 @@ initial_for_parallel()
>>>    	}
>>>
>>>    	/*
>>> +	 * initial page_flag for each thread
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if ((info->page_flag_buf = malloc(sizeof(void *) * info->num_threads))
>>> +	    == NULL) {
>>> +		MSG("Can't allocate memory for page_flag_buf. %s\n",
>>> +				strerror(errno));
>>> +		return FALSE;
>>> +	}
>>> +	memset(info->page_flag_buf, 0, sizeof(void *) * info->num_threads);
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>> +		if ((info->page_flag_buf[i] = calloc(1, sizeof(struct page_flag))) == NULL) {
>>> +			MSG("Can't allocate memory for page_flag. %s\n",
>>> +				strerror(errno));
>>> +			return FALSE;
>>> +		}
>>> +		current = info->page_flag_buf[i];
>>> +
>>> +		for (j = 1; j < NUM_BUFFERS; j++) {
>>> +			if ((current->next = calloc(1, sizeof(struct page_flag))) == NULL) {
>>> +				MSG("Can't allocate memory for page_flag. %s\n",
>>> +					strerror(errno));
>>> +				return FALSE;
>>> +			}
>>> +			current = current->next;
>>> +		}
>>> +		current->next = info->page_flag_buf[i];
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>>    	 * initial fd_memory for threads
>>>    	 */
>>>    	for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>> @@ -3612,7 +3649,8 @@ initial_for_parallel()
>>>    void
>>>    free_for_parallel()
>>>    {
>>> -	int i;
>>> +	int i, j;
>>> +	struct page_flag *current;
>>>
>>>    	if (info->threads != NULL) {
>>>    		for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>> @@ -3655,6 +3693,19 @@ free_for_parallel()
>>>    		free(info->page_data_buf);
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> +	if (info->page_flag_buf != NULL) {
>>> +		for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>> +			for (j = 0; j < NUM_BUFFERS; j++) {
>>> +				if (info->page_flag_buf[i] != NULL) {
>>> +					current = info->page_flag_buf[i];
>>> +					info->page_flag_buf[i] = current->next;
>>> +					free(current);
>>> +				}
>>> +			}
>>> +		}
>>> +		free(info->page_flag_buf);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	if (info->parallel_info == NULL)
>>>    		return;
>>>
>>> @@ -7075,11 +7126,11 @@ void *
>>>    kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>>>    	void *retval = PTHREAD_FAIL;
>>>    	struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args = (struct thread_args *)arg;
>>> -	struct page_data *page_data_buf = kdump_thread_args->page_data_buf;
>>> +	volatile struct page_data *page_data_buf = kdump_thread_args->page_data_buf;
>>> +	volatile struct page_flag *page_flag_buf = kdump_thread_args->page_flag_buf;
>>>    	struct cycle *cycle = kdump_thread_args->cycle;
>>> -	int page_data_num = kdump_thread_args->page_data_num;
>>> -	mdf_pfn_t pfn;
>>> -	int index;
>>> +	mdf_pfn_t pfn = cycle->start_pfn;
>>> +	int index = kdump_thread_args->thread_num;
>>>    	int buf_ready;
>>>    	int dumpable;
>>>    	int fd_memory = 0;
>>> @@ -7125,47 +7176,48 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>>>    						kdump_thread_args->thread_num);
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	while (1) {
>>> -		/* get next pfn */
>>> -		pthread_mutex_lock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>>> -		pfn = info->current_pfn;
>>> -		info->current_pfn++;
>>> -		pthread_mutex_unlock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>>> -
>>> -		if (pfn >= kdump_thread_args->end_pfn)
>>> -			break;
>>> -
>>> -		index = -1;
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * filtered page won't take anything
>>> +	 * unfiltered zero page will only take a page_flag_buf
>>> +	 * unfiltered non-zero page will take a page_flag_buf and a page_data_buf
>>> +	 */
>>> +	while (pfn < cycle->end_pfn) {
>>>    		buf_ready = FALSE;
>>>
>>> +		pthread_mutex_lock(&info->page_data_mutex);
>>> +		while (page_data_buf[index].used != FALSE) {
>>> +			index = (index + 1) % info->num_buffers;
>>> +		}
>>> +		page_data_buf[index].used = TRUE;
>>> +		pthread_mutex_unlock(&info->page_data_mutex);
>>> +
>>>    		while (buf_ready == FALSE) {
>>>    			pthread_testcancel();
>>> -
>>> -			index = pfn % page_data_num;
>>> -
>>> -			if (pfn - info->consumed_pfn > info->num_buffers)
>>> +			if (page_flag_buf->ready == FLAG_READY)
>>>    				continue;
>>>
>>> -			if (page_data_buf[index].ready != 0)
>>> -				continue;
>>> -
>>> -			pthread_mutex_lock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
>>> -
>>> -			if (page_data_buf[index].ready != 0)
>>> -				goto unlock;
>>> -
>>> -			buf_ready = TRUE;
>>> +			/* get next dumpable pfn */
>>> +			pthread_mutex_lock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>>> +			for (pfn = info->current_pfn; pfn < cycle->end_pfn; pfn++) {
>>> +				dumpable = is_dumpable(
>>> +					info->fd_bitmap ? &bitmap_parallel : info->bitmap2,
>>> +					pfn,
>>> +					cycle);
>>> +				if (dumpable)
>>> +					break;
>>> +			}
>>> +			info->current_pfn = pfn + 1;
>>>
>>> -			page_data_buf[index].pfn = pfn;
>>> -			page_data_buf[index].ready = 1;
>>> +			page_flag_buf->pfn = pfn;
>>> +			page_flag_buf->ready = FLAG_FILLING;
>>> +			pthread_mutex_unlock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>>> +			sem_post(&info->page_flag_buf_sem);
>>>
>>> -			dumpable = is_dumpable(
>>> -				info->fd_bitmap ? &bitmap_parallel : info->bitmap2,
>>> -				pfn,
>>> -				cycle);
>>> -			page_data_buf[index].dumpable = dumpable;
>>> -			if (!dumpable)
>>> -				goto unlock;
>>> +			if (pfn >= cycle->end_pfn) {
>>> +				info->current_pfn = cycle->end_pfn;
>>> +				page_data_buf[index].used = FALSE;
>>> +				break;
>>> +			}
>>>
>>>    			if (!read_pfn_parallel(fd_memory, pfn, buf,
>>>    					       &bitmap_memory_parallel,
>>> @@ -7178,11 +7230,11 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>>>
>>>    			if ((info->dump_level & DL_EXCLUDE_ZERO)
>>>    			    && is_zero_page(buf, info->page_size)) {
>>> -				page_data_buf[index].zero = TRUE;
>>> -				goto unlock;
>>> +				page_flag_buf->zero = TRUE;
>>> +				goto next;
>>>    			}
>>>
>>> -			page_data_buf[index].zero = FALSE;
>>> +			page_flag_buf->zero = FALSE;
>>>
>>>    			/*
>>>    			 * Compress the page data.
>>> @@ -7210,6 +7262,7 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>>>    				page_data_buf[index].flags =
>>>    							DUMP_DH_COMPRESSED_LZO;
>>>    				page_data_buf[index].size  = size_out;
>>> +
>>>    				memcpy(page_data_buf[index].buf, buf_out, size_out);
>>>    #endif
>>>    #ifdef USESNAPPY
>>> @@ -7232,12 +7285,14 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>>>    				page_data_buf[index].size  = info->page_size;
>>>    				memcpy(page_data_buf[index].buf, buf, info->page_size);
>>>    			}
>>> -unlock:
>>> -			pthread_mutex_unlock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
>>> +			page_flag_buf->index = index;
>>> +			buf_ready = TRUE;
>>> +next:
>>> +			page_flag_buf->ready = FLAG_READY;
>>> +			page_flag_buf = page_flag_buf->next;
>>>
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>> -
>>>    	retval = NULL;
>>>
>>>    fail:
>>> @@ -7265,14 +7320,15 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
>>>    	struct page_desc pd;
>>>    	struct timeval tv_start;
>>>    	struct timeval last, new;
>>> -	unsigned long long consuming_pfn;
>>>    	pthread_t **threads = NULL;
>>>    	struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args = NULL;
>>>    	void *thread_result;
>>> -	int page_data_num;
>>> +	int page_buf_num;
>>>    	struct page_data *page_data_buf = NULL;
>>>    	int i;
>>>    	int index;
>>> +	int end_count, consuming, check_count;
>>> +	mdf_pfn_t current_pfn, temp_pfn;
>>>
>>>    	if (info->flag_elf_dumpfile)
>>>    		return FALSE;
>>> @@ -7284,13 +7340,6 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
>>>    		goto out;
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	res = pthread_mutex_init(&info->consumed_pfn_mutex, NULL);
>>> -	if (res != 0) {
>>> -		ERRMSG("Can't initialize consumed_pfn_mutex. %s\n",
>>> -				strerror(res));
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>>    	res = pthread_mutex_init(&info->filter_mutex, NULL);
>>>    	if (res != 0) {
>>>    		ERRMSG("Can't initialize filter_mutex. %s\n", strerror(res));
>>> @@ -7314,36 +7363,23 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
>>>    	end_pfn   = cycle->end_pfn;
>>>
>>>    	info->current_pfn = start_pfn;
>>> -	info->consumed_pfn = start_pfn - 1;
>>>
>>>    	threads = info->threads;
>>>    	kdump_thread_args = info->kdump_thread_args;
>>>
>>> -	page_data_num = info->num_buffers;
>>> +	page_buf_num = info->num_buffers;
>>>    	page_data_buf = info->page_data_buf;
>>> +	pthread_mutex_init(&info->page_data_mutex, NULL);
>>> +	sem_init(&info->page_flag_buf_sem, 0, 0);
>>>
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < page_data_num; i++) {
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * producer will use pfn in page_data_buf to decide the
>>> -		 * consumed pfn
>>> -		 */
>>> -		page_data_buf[i].pfn = start_pfn - 1;
>>> -		page_data_buf[i].ready = 0;
>>> -		res = pthread_mutex_init(&page_data_buf[i].mutex, NULL);
>>> -		if (res != 0) {
>>> -			ERRMSG("Can't initialize mutex of page_data_buf. %s\n",
>>> -					strerror(res));
>>> -			goto out;
>>> -		}
>>> -	}
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < page_buf_num; i++)
>>> +		page_data_buf[i].used = FALSE;
>>>
>>>    	for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>>    		kdump_thread_args[i].thread_num = i;
>>>    		kdump_thread_args[i].len_buf_out = len_buf_out;
>>> -		kdump_thread_args[i].start_pfn = start_pfn;
>>> -		kdump_thread_args[i].end_pfn = end_pfn;
>>> -		kdump_thread_args[i].page_data_num = page_data_num;
>>>    		kdump_thread_args[i].page_data_buf = page_data_buf;
>>> +		kdump_thread_args[i].page_flag_buf = info->page_flag_buf[i];
>>>    		kdump_thread_args[i].cycle = cycle;
>>>
>>>    		res = pthread_create(threads[i], NULL,
>>> @@ -7356,55 +7392,88 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	consuming_pfn = start_pfn;
>>> -	index = -1;
>>> +	end_count = 0;
>>> +	while (1) {
>>> +		consuming = 0;
>>> +		check_count = 0;
>>>
>>> -	gettimeofday(&last, NULL);
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * The basic idea is producer producing page and consumer writing page.
>>> +		 * Each producer have a page_flag_buf list which is used for storing page's description.
>>> +		 * The size of page_flag_buf is little so it won't take too much memory.
>>> +		 * And all producers will share a page_data_buf array which is used for storing page's compressed data.
>>> +		 * The main thread is the consumer. It will find the next pfn and write it into file.
>>> +		 * The next pfn is smallest pfn in all page_flag_buf.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		sem_wait(&info->page_flag_buf_sem);
>>> +		gettimeofday(&last, NULL);
>>> +		while (1) {
>>> +			current_pfn = end_pfn;
>>>
>>> -	while (consuming_pfn < end_pfn) {
>>> -		index = consuming_pfn % page_data_num;
>>> +			/*
>>> +			 * page_flag_buf is in circular linked list.
>>> +			 * The array info->page_flag_buf[] records the current page_flag_buf in each thread's
>>> +			 * page_flag_buf list.
>>> +			 * consuming is used for recording in which thread the pfn is the smallest.
>>> +			 * current_pfn is used for recording the value of pfn when checking the pfn.
>>> +			 */
>>> +			for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>>> +				if (info->page_flag_buf[i]->ready == FLAG_UNUSED)
>>> +					continue;
>>> +				temp_pfn = info->page_flag_buf[i]->pfn;
>>>
>>> -		gettimeofday(&new, NULL);
>>> -		if (new.tv_sec - last.tv_sec > WAIT_TIME) {
>>> -			ERRMSG("Can't get data of pfn %llx.\n", consuming_pfn);
>>> -			goto out;
>>> -		}
>>> +				/*
>>> +				 * count how many threads have reached the end.
>>> +				 */
>>> +				if (temp_pfn >= end_pfn) {
>>> +					info->page_flag_buf[i]->ready = FLAG_UNUSED;
>>> +					end_count++;
>>> +					continue;
>>> +				}
>>>
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * check pfn first without mutex locked to reduce the time
>>> -		 * trying to lock the mutex
>>> -		 */
>>> -		if (page_data_buf[index].pfn != consuming_pfn)
>>> -			continue;
>>> +				if (current_pfn < temp_pfn)
>>> +					continue;
>>>
>>> -		if (pthread_mutex_trylock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex) != 0)
>>> -			continue;
>>> +				check_count++;
>>> +				consuming = i;
>>> +				current_pfn = temp_pfn;
>>> +			}
>>>
>>> -		/* check whether the found one is ready to be consumed */
>>> -		if (page_data_buf[index].pfn != consuming_pfn ||
>>> -		    page_data_buf[index].ready != 1) {
>>> -			goto unlock;
>>> +			/*
>>> +			 * If all the threads have reached the end, we will finish writing.
>>> +			 */
>>> +			if (end_count >= info->num_threads)
>>> +				goto finish;
>>> +
>>> +			/*
>>> +			 * If the page_flag_buf is not ready, the pfn recorded may be changed.
>>> +			 * So we should recheck.
>>> +			 */
>>> +			if (info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->ready != FLAG_READY) {
>>> +				gettimeofday(&new, NULL);
>>> +				if (new.tv_sec - last.tv_sec > WAIT_TIME) {
>>> +					ERRMSG("Can't get data of pfn.\n");
>>> +					goto out;
>>> +				}
>>> +				continue;
>>> +			}
>>> +
>>> +			if (current_pfn == info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->pfn)
>>> +				break;
>>>    		}
>>>
>>>    		if ((num_dumped % per) == 0)
>>>    			print_progress(PROGRESS_COPY, num_dumped, info->num_dumpable);
>>>
>>> -		/* next pfn is found, refresh last here */
>>> -		last = new;
>>> -		consuming_pfn++;
>>> -		info->consumed_pfn++;
>>> -		page_data_buf[index].ready = 0;
>>> -
>>> -		if (page_data_buf[index].dumpable == FALSE)
>>> -			goto unlock;
>>> -
>>>    		num_dumped++;
>>>
>>> -		if (page_data_buf[index].zero == TRUE) {
>>> +
>>> +		if (info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->zero == TRUE) {
>>>    			if (!write_cache(cd_header, pd_zero, sizeof(page_desc_t)))
>>>    				goto out;
>>>    			pfn_zero++;
>>>    		} else {
>>> +			index = info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->index;
>>>    			pd.flags      = page_data_buf[index].flags;
>>>    			pd.size       = page_data_buf[index].size;
>>>    			pd.page_flags = 0;
>>> @@ -7420,12 +7489,12 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
>>>    			 */
>>>    			if (!write_cache(cd_page, page_data_buf[index].buf, pd.size))
>>>    				goto out;
>>> -
>>> +			page_data_buf[index].used = FALSE;
>>>    		}
>>> -unlock:
>>> -		pthread_mutex_unlock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
>>> +		info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->ready = FLAG_UNUSED;
>>> +		info->page_flag_buf[consuming] = info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->next;
>>>    	}
>>> -
>>> +finish:
>>>    	ret = TRUE;
>>>    	/*
>>>    	 * print [100 %]
>>> @@ -7463,15 +7532,9 @@ out:
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	if (page_data_buf != NULL) {
>>> -		for (i = 0; i < page_data_num; i++) {
>>> -			pthread_mutex_destroy(&page_data_buf[i].mutex);
>>> -		}
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> +	sem_destroy(&info->page_flag_buf_sem);
>>>    	pthread_rwlock_destroy(&info->usemmap_rwlock);
>>>    	pthread_mutex_destroy(&info->filter_mutex);
>>> -	pthread_mutex_destroy(&info->consumed_pfn_mutex);
>>>    	pthread_mutex_destroy(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>>>
>>>    	return ret;
>>> @@ -7564,6 +7627,7 @@ write_kdump_pages_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header, struct cache_data *cd_pag
>>>    		num_dumped++;
>>>    		if (!read_pfn(pfn, buf))
>>>    			goto out;
>>> +
>>>    		filter_data_buffer(buf, pfn_to_paddr(pfn), info->page_size);
>>>
>>>    		/*
>>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
>>> index e0b5bbf..4b315c0 100644
>>> --- a/makedumpfile.h
>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>>    #include "print_info.h"
>>>    #include "sadump_mod.h"
>>>    #include <pthread.h>
>>> +#include <semaphore.h>
>>>
>>>    /*
>>>     * Result of command
>>> @@ -977,7 +978,7 @@ typedef unsigned long long int ulonglong;
>>>    #define PAGE_DATA_NUM	(50)
>>>    #define WAIT_TIME	(60 * 10)
>>>    #define PTHREAD_FAIL	((void *)-2)
>>> -#define NUM_BUFFERS	(50)
>>> +#define NUM_BUFFERS	(20)
>>>
>>>    struct mmap_cache {
>>>    	char	*mmap_buf;
>>> @@ -985,28 +986,33 @@ struct mmap_cache {
>>>    	off_t   mmap_end_offset;
>>>    };
>>>
>>> +enum {
>>> +	FLAG_UNUSED,
>>> +	FLAG_READY,
>>> +	FLAG_FILLING
>>> +};
>>> +struct page_flag {
>>> +	mdf_pfn_t pfn;
>>> +	char zero;
>>> +	char ready;
>>> +	short index;
>>> +	struct page_flag *next;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    struct page_data
>>>    {
>>> -	mdf_pfn_t pfn;
>>> -	int dumpable;
>>> -	int zero;
>>> -	unsigned int flags;
>>>    	long size;
>>>    	unsigned char *buf;
>>> -	pthread_mutex_t mutex;
>>> -	/*
>>> -	 * whether the page_data is ready to be consumed
>>> -	 */
>>> -	int ready;
>>> +	int flags;
>>> +	int used;
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    struct thread_args {
>>>    	int thread_num;
>>>    	unsigned long len_buf_out;
>>> -	mdf_pfn_t start_pfn, end_pfn;
>>> -	int page_data_num;
>>>    	struct cycle *cycle;
>>>    	struct page_data *page_data_buf;
>>> +	struct page_flag *page_flag_buf;
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    /*
>>> @@ -1295,11 +1301,12 @@ struct DumpInfo {
>>>    	pthread_t **threads;
>>>    	struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args;
>>>    	struct page_data *page_data_buf;
>>> +	struct page_flag **page_flag_buf;
>>> +	sem_t page_flag_buf_sem;
>>>    	pthread_rwlock_t usemmap_rwlock;
>>>    	mdf_pfn_t current_pfn;
>>>    	pthread_mutex_t current_pfn_mutex;
>>> -	mdf_pfn_t consumed_pfn;
>>> -	pthread_mutex_t consumed_pfn_mutex;
>>> +	pthread_mutex_t page_data_mutex;
>>>    	pthread_mutex_t filter_mutex;
>>>    };
>>>    extern struct DumpInfo		*info;
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kexec mailing list
>> kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec




_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-09  0:27 [PATCH v4] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31 Zhou Wenjian
2016-03-09  0:35 ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-11  1:00 ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-11  3:03   ` Minoru Usui
2016-03-11  3:10     ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" [this message]
2016-03-11  4:55       ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-03-11  5:33   ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-15  6:34 ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-15  7:12   ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-15  7:38     ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-15  9:33     ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-16  1:55       ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-16  8:04         ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-16  8:24           ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-16  8:26           ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
     [not found]             ` <B049E864-7426-4817-96FA-8E3CCA59CA24@redhat.com>
2016-03-16  8:59               ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-16  9:30                 ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-15  8:35   ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-18  2:46   ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-18  4:16     ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-18  5:48       ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-24  5:28         ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-24  5:39           ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-25  2:57             ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-03-28  1:23               ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-03-28  5:43                 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-03-31  8:38         ` Minfei Huang
2016-03-31  9:09           ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-04-01  6:27             ` Minfei Huang
2016-04-01 11:21               ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-04-01 13:15                 ` Minfei Huang
2016-04-04  5:46                   ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-04-05  9:18                     ` Minfei Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E23729.2000702@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=min-usui@ti.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.