From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sean_Nyekj=c3=a6r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: sc16is7xx: implemented our own oneshot-like handling Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: <56E6578F.6000907@prevas.dk> References: <20160313200558.06543fce@kerio.vanmierlo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160313200558.06543fce@kerio.vanmierlo.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maarten Brock , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Josh Cartwright , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Jon Ringle List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 2016-03-13 20:05, Maarten Brock wrote: > I also wonder why this driver doesn't use threaded interrupts, just like the > MAX310x driver it is based upon. > > Maarten Me too.. :-) But both I and Sebastian Andrzej Siewior have proposed a PATCH for that but it was turned down. > > >> This driver should use a threaded interrupt instead of trying to emulate it >> via dis/enable_irq and a worker thread. >> >> Then you simply call c16is7xx_port_irq() right from the interrupt routine >> and the core code deals with the interrupt mask/unmask automatically. >> >> Thanks, >> >> tglx Remember not to top post :-) and use a proper mail client that uses In-Reply-To... /Sean From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sean_Nyekj=c3=a6r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: sc16is7xx: implemented our own oneshot-like handling Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: <56E6578F.6000907@prevas.dk> References: <20160313200558.06543fce@kerio.vanmierlo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Josh Cartwright , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , Jon Ringle To: Maarten Brock , Return-path: Received: from mail02.prevas.se ([62.95.78.10]:15304 "EHLO mail02.prevas.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933400AbcCNGRy (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:17:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160313200558.06543fce@kerio.vanmierlo.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2016-03-13 20:05, Maarten Brock wrote: > I also wonder why this driver doesn't use threaded interrupts, just like the > MAX310x driver it is based upon. > > Maarten Me too.. :-) But both I and Sebastian Andrzej Siewior have proposed a PATCH for that but it was turned down. > > >> This driver should use a threaded interrupt instead of trying to emulate it >> via dis/enable_irq and a worker thread. >> >> Then you simply call c16is7xx_port_irq() right from the interrupt routine >> and the core code deals with the interrupt mask/unmask automatically. >> >> Thanks, >> >> tglx Remember not to top post :-) and use a proper mail client that uses In-Reply-To... /Sean