From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jaya Tiwari <tiwari.jaya18@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Allocating Large sized arrays to heap
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:20:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E6C89F.5030503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457712721-2933-1-git-send-email-tiwari.jaya18@gmail.com>
The subject isn't very clear, because it doesn't say which subsystem is
being modified. You should use something like
virtio: allocate temporary VirtQueueElementOld on heap
The rest of the commit message is okay, but the lines are a bit long.
Usually we use 70-75 characters only.
On 11/03/2016 17:12, Jaya Tiwari wrote:
> As per the list of functions in http://wiki.qemu.org/BiteSizedTasks#Large_frames,
> qemu_get_virtqueue_element and qemu_put_virtqueue_element have large arrays on stack
> Hence, moving them to heap. This reduced their stack size from something 49248 to fit into less than 200
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Tiwari <tiwari.jaya18@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 08275a9..7a7afae 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -636,67 +636,66 @@ typedef struct VirtQueueElementOld {
> void *qemu_get_virtqueue_element(QEMUFile *f, size_t sz)
> {
> VirtQueueElement *elem;
> - VirtQueueElementOld data;
> + VirtQueueElementOld *data = g_new(VirtQueueElementOld, 1);
Unconditional allocation is okay, because this is not a fast path.
> int i;
>
> - qemu_get_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)&data, sizeof(VirtQueueElementOld));
> + qemu_get_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)data, sizeof(VirtQueueElementOld));
>
> - elem = virtqueue_alloc_element(sz, data.out_num, data.in_num);
> - elem->index = data.index;
> + elem = virtqueue_alloc_element(sz, data->out_num, data->in_num);
> + elem->index = data->index;
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->in_num; i++) {
> - elem->in_addr[i] = data.in_addr[i];
> + elem->in_addr[i] = data->in_addr[i];
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->out_num; i++) {
> - elem->out_addr[i] = data.out_addr[i];
> + elem->out_addr[i] = data->out_addr[i];
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->in_num; i++) {
> /* Base is overwritten by virtqueue_map. */
> elem->in_sg[i].iov_base = 0;
> - elem->in_sg[i].iov_len = data.in_sg[i].iov_len;
> + elem->in_sg[i].iov_len = data->in_sg[i].iov_len;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->out_num; i++) {
> /* Base is overwritten by virtqueue_map. */
> elem->out_sg[i].iov_base = 0;
> - elem->out_sg[i].iov_len = data.out_sg[i].iov_len;
> + elem->out_sg[i].iov_len = data->out_sg[i].iov_len;
> }
> -
> + g_free(data);
> virtqueue_map(elem);
> return elem;
> }
>
> void qemu_put_virtqueue_element(QEMUFile *f, VirtQueueElement *elem)
> {
> - VirtQueueElementOld data;
> + VirtQueueElementOld *data = g_new0(VirtQueueElementOld, 1);
> int i;
> -
> - memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
> - data.index = elem->index;
> - data.in_num = elem->in_num;
> - data.out_num = elem->out_num;
> + data->index = elem->index;
> + data->in_num = elem->in_num;
> + data->out_num = elem->out_num;
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->in_num; i++) {
> - data.in_addr[i] = elem->in_addr[i];
> + data->in_addr[i] = elem->in_addr[i];
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->out_num; i++) {
> - data.out_addr[i] = elem->out_addr[i];
> + data->out_addr[i] = elem->out_addr[i];
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->in_num; i++) {
> /* Base is overwritten by virtqueue_map when loading. Do not
> * save it, as it would leak the QEMU address space layout. */
> - data.in_sg[i].iov_len = elem->in_sg[i].iov_len;
> + data->in_sg[i].iov_len = elem->in_sg[i].iov_len;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < elem->out_num; i++) {
> /* Do not save iov_base as above. */
> - data.out_sg[i].iov_len = elem->out_sg[i].iov_len;
> + data->out_sg[i].iov_len = elem->out_sg[i].iov_len;
> }
> - qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)&data, sizeof(VirtQueueElementOld));
> + qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)data, sizeof(VirtQueueElementOld));
> + free(data);
This should have been g_free. Apart from this and the subject,
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
I suggest that you send a fixed version and include mst@redhat.com in
the recipients.
Thanks,
Paolo
> }
>
> /* virtio device */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 16:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Allocating Large sized arrays to heap Jaya Tiwari
2016-03-14 14:20 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-14 15:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/1] virtio:Allocate temporary VirtQueueElementOld on heap Jaya Tiwari
2016-03-15 7:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-15 7:36 ` Jaya Tiwari
2016-03-15 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-15 9:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E6C89F.5030503@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tiwari.jaya18@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.