[Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2016-03-13

[Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>]

Dear Thomas,

On 14/03/2016 12:00, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Luca,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:45:24 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/03/2016 08:30, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> [...]
>>>          arm |                 libpjsip-2.4.5 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e5c85272b5561549dfc478264ee6507bb9ad8c9f/
>>
>> Musl toolchain, and as Thomas already pointed out libpjsip does not
>> build with it.
>>
>> Patches to fix this issue are almost ready here. But it might need a
>> little extra time before I can send them to Buildroot because the pjsip
>> project requires Copyright Assignment, with associated paperwork... :|
> 
> Two options:
> 
>  1/ You submit your patches to Buildroot before doing the copyright
>     assignment. From a Buildroot point of view, it is sufficient if
>     your patches are licensed under the publicly available license of
>     pjsip. Of course, if they later get merged upstream after doing the
>     copyright assignment, it is better, but that doesn't prevent from
>     submitting the patches to Buildroot IMO.
> 
>  2/ You submit a patch that disables pjsip on musl for the moment, and
>     you can re-enable it once the patches have been accepted upstream.

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

In this specific case, since there is a fix I prefer to apply it rather
than disabling the package. I just sent a patch to fix it.

-- 
Luca