From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i'
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7B39D.5010406@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eea7f5b8bfa634cc1fb6f3232f6404a4bda2611f.1446105200.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
ping ...
On 10/29/2015 03:54 PM, Chen Qi wrote:
> This patch make `uname -p' and `uname -i' not reporting 'unknown'.
> It refers a to Fedora's way to do this.
>
> The coreutils upstream rejects to accept this patch, blaming the
> 'unknown' result to the kernel not providing enough information.
> As on normal distros, `uname -p' and `uname -i' do not report 'unknown',
> we refer to Fedora's patch to fix this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
> ...e-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c5f449f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +Upstream-Status: Rejected
> +
> +Subject: uname: report processor and hardware correctly
> +
> +This patch is rejected by coreutils upstream, but distros like debian and fedora
> +uses this patch to make `uname -i' and `uname -p' to not report 'unknown'.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> +---
> + src/uname.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> + 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/src/uname.c b/src/uname.c
> +index 39bd28c..c84582d 100644
> +--- a/src/uname.c
> ++++ b/src/uname.c
> +@@ -299,13 +299,19 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> +
> + if (toprint & PRINT_PROCESSOR)
> + {
> +- char const *element = unknown;
> ++ char *element = unknown;
> + #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_ARCHITECTURE
> + {
> + static char processor[257];
> + if (0 <= sysinfo (SI_ARCHITECTURE, processor, sizeof processor))
> + element = processor;
> + }
> ++#else
> ++ {
> ++ static struct utsname u;
> ++ uname(&u);
> ++ element = u.machine;
> ++ }
> + #endif
> + #ifdef UNAME_PROCESSOR
> + if (element == unknown)
> +@@ -343,7 +349,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> +
> + if (toprint & PRINT_HARDWARE_PLATFORM)
> + {
> +- char const *element = unknown;
> ++ char *element = unknown;
> + #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_PLATFORM
> + {
> + static char hardware_platform[257];
> +@@ -361,6 +367,14 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> + if (sysctl (mib, 2, hardware_platform, &s, 0, 0) >= 0)
> + element = hardware_platform;
> + }
> ++#else
> ++ {
> ++ static struct utsname u;
> ++ uname(&u);
> ++ element = u.machine;
> ++ if(strlen(element)==4 && element[0]=='i' && element[2]=='8' && element[3]=='6')
> ++ element[1]='3';
> ++ }
> + #endif
> + if (! (toprint == UINT_MAX && element == unknown))
> + print_element (element);
> +--
> +1.9.1
> +
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> index f042346..ae9c375 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/coreutils/${BP}.tar.xz;name=tarball \
> file://remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch \
> file://fix-selinux-flask.patch \
> file://0001-Unset-need_charset_alias-when-building-for-musl.patch \
> + file://0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch \
> "
>
> SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "40efdbce865d2458d8da0a9dcee7c16c"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-29 7:54 [PATCH 0/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i' Chen Qi
2015-10-29 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2016-03-15 7:02 ` ChenQi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E7B39D.5010406@windriver.com \
--to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.