From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:31:12 +0100
Message-ID: <56E94400.1040109@suse.cz>
References: <20160316105851.015ff688@canb.auug.org.au>
 <56E91108.5050105@bmw-carit.de> <56E911C2.3060802@suse.cz>
 <20160316222941.4be25283@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59342 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751101AbcCPLbS (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:31:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160316222941.4be25283@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On 2016-03-16 12:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:56:50 +0100 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Right. Stephen, could you perhaps move the kbuild tree down in your list
>> a bit, so that the fixes are present?
> 
> Done.
> 
> Now you just need to make sure Linus gets them in the right order :-)

That's the plan :).

Michal