From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <private@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Crash in arm_pmu_device_probe() due to 'drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info messages more verbose'
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:18:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EBC7EC.6000907@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EBA3C3.10907@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter,
On 18.03.2016 07:44, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing the attached crash when running a realview-pb-a8 image with
> realview_defconfig in qemu.
> bisect wasn't successful, but a commit analysis identified commit
> 'drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info
> messages more verbose' as the culprit. Reverting this commit fixes the
> problem.
>
> The code roughly looks as follows.
>
> int arm_pmu_device_probe()
> {
> ...
> if (node && ..) {
> } else {
> }
>
> if (ret) {
> pr_info("%s: failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n",
> node->full_name, ret);
> goto out_free;
> }
> ....
> out_free:
> pr_info("%s: failed to register PMU devices! Error %i\n",
> node->full_name, ret);
> ....
> }
>
> Note that 'node' is dereferenced even though it was previously checked
> if it is NULL.
> The configuration I am testing does not use devicetree.
>
> Can you use dev_info() instead ?
Does anything like below [1] does work for you?
If so, could you please share the output? I.e. what it prints in your
non-devicetree non-pmu case?
Best regards
Dirk
[1]
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 11bacc7..bda3502 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -1002,8 +1002,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
}
if (ret) {
- pr_info("%s: failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n",
- node->full_name, ret);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n",
ret);
goto out_free;
}
@@ -1023,8 +1022,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
out_destroy:
cpu_pmu_destroy(pmu);
out_free:
- pr_info("%s: failed to register PMU devices! Error %i\n",
- node->full_name, ret);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "failed to register PMU devices! Error
%i\n", ret);
kfree(pmu);
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 6:44 linux-next: Crash in arm_pmu_device_probe() due to 'drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info messages more verbose' Guenter Roeck
2016-03-18 9:18 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2016-03-18 13:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-03-21 7:02 ` Dirk Behme
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EBC7EC.6000907@de.bosch.com \
--to=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=private@roeck-us.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.