All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] leds: triggers: add support for RGB triggers
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:34:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F0309A.8020801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F014DC.7060405@samsung.com>

Am 21.03.2016 um 16:35 schrieb Jacek Anaszewski:
> On 03/19/2016 08:11 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Am 18.03.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Jacek Anaszewski:
>>> On 03/17/2016 08:53 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>> Am 17.03.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Jacek Anaszewski:
>>>>> Hi Heiner,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/13/2016 06:14 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>>> Add basic support for RGB triggers. Triggers with flag LED_TRIG_CAP_RGB
>>>>>> set are available to RGB LED devices only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/leds/led-triggers.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>>>>>     include/linux/leds.h        |  3 +++
>>>>>>     2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c b/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
>>>>>> index 2181581..3ccf88b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
>>>>>> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ static LIST_HEAD(trigger_list);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      /* Used by LED Class */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static inline bool led_trig_check_rgb(struct led_trigger *trig,
>>>>>> +                      struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    return !(trig->flags & LED_TRIG_CAP_RGB) ||
>>>>>> +           led_cdev->flags & LED_DEV_CAP_RGB;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you explain what is the purpose of this function?
>>>>> What actually do we want to check here?
>>>>>
>>>> Triggers using RGB functionality can't be used with non-RGB LED's.
>>>> This check checks for such unsupported combinations:
>>>> It returns false if the trigger uses RGB functionality but LED doesn't
>>>> support the RGB extension.
>>>
>>> We need more meaningful name for it. Maybe led_trigger_is_supported() ?
>>> And let's make it no-op for !CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_RGB case.
>>>
>> OK, led_trigger_is_supported() is better.
>>
>> Making the function a no-op in the non-RGB case would have some impact:
>> We'd have to make sure that all public trigger functions are a de-facto no-op
>> for RGB triggers (at least register / unregister). Means we would need
>> something like this in each public trigger function:
>>
>> #if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_RGB)
>>     if (trig->flags & LED_TRIG_CAP_RGB))
>>         return;
>> #endif
>>
>> I think this would add a lot of overhead and therefore IMHO it's better to
>> not make the check function a no-op.
> 
> Wouldn't it suffice to make the no-op returning true?
> Preventing RGB trigger registration for non-RGB LED class configuration
> seems to be different thing, also to be considered.
> 
No, it's not sufficient. Let's say the RGB extension is disabled and we have a RGB trigger.
The check is a no-op now (returns always true), therefore the RGB trigger would be displayed
in the list of available triggers also for all non-RGB LED's.

We could maximum remove the "|| led_cdev->flags & LED_DEV_CAP_RGB" from the check if
the RGB extension is disabled. But it's open whether this minimal gain in a non-critical
code path justifies this.

>>>>>>     ssize_t led_trigger_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>>>>             const char *buf, size_t count)
>>>>>>     {
>>>>>> @@ -52,12 +59,12 @@ ssize_t led_trigger_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>>>>         down_read(&triggers_list_lock);
>>>>>>         list_for_each_entry(trig, &trigger_list, next_trig) {
>>>>>>             if (sysfs_streq(buf, trig->name)) {
>>>>>> +            if (!led_trig_check_rgb(trig, led_cdev))
>>>>>> +                break;
>>>>
>>>> Check for the case that userspace wants to set a RGB trigger for a non-RGB LED via sysfs.
>>>>
>>>>>>                 down_write(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
>>>>>>                 led_trigger_set(led_cdev, trig);
>>>>>>                 up_write(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -            up_read(&triggers_list_lock);
>>>>>> -            goto unlock;
>>>>>> +            break;
>>>
>>> This seems to be an unrelated cleanup. Please submit it separately.
>>>
>> OK
>>
>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>         up_read(&triggers_list_lock);
>>>>>> @@ -84,6 +91,8 @@ ssize_t led_trigger_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>>>>             len += sprintf(buf+len, "none ");
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         list_for_each_entry(trig, &trigger_list, next_trig) {
>>>>>> +        if (!led_trig_check_rgb(trig, led_cdev))
>>>>>> +            continue;
>>>>
>>>> Omit RGB triggers when listing the available triggers for a non-RGB LED via sysfs.
>>>>
>>>>>>             if (led_cdev->trigger && !strcmp(led_cdev->trigger->name,
>>>>>>                                 trig->name))
>>>>>>                 len += sprintf(buf+len, "[%s] ", trig->name);
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> index 58e22e6..07eb074 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ enum led_brightness led_hsv_to_rgb(enum led_brightness hsv);
>>>>>>     struct led_trigger {
>>>>>>         /* Trigger Properties */
>>>>>>         const char     *name;
>>>>>> +    u8        flags;
>>>>>> +#define LED_TRIG_CAP_RGB    BIT(0)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>         void        (*activate)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
>>>>>>         void        (*deactivate)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-21 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-13 17:14 [PATCH 1/3] leds: triggers: add support for RGB triggers Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-17 13:41 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-17 19:53   ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-18 13:10     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-19 19:11       ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-21 15:35         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-21 17:34           ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2016-03-22  8:05             ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-22 11:47               ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-22 16:00                 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-22 22:06                   ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-23  8:32                     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-23 11:57                       ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-23 16:02                         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-23 16:36                           ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-24 13:23                             ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-24 15:44                               ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-03-24 21:32                                 ` Jacek Anaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F0309A.8020801@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.