From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6264490857152380928 X-Gmail-Labels: Topic type: DISCUSSION X-Received: by 10.194.24.233 with SMTP id x9mr4129950wjf.0.1458618926206; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.3.9 with SMTP id 9ls766278wmd.39.gmail; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.216.3 with SMTP id om3mr4110474wjc.7.1458618925633; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x243.google.com (mail-lb0-x243.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::243]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ph10si932894lbb.0.2016.03.21.20.55.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::243 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::243; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::243 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-lb0-x243.google.com with SMTP id wn5so12880004lbb.2 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xIKsO4z+A43hGxaSkRrNSGJpdpdNhflGXSiphLJzUNU=; b=Gp3VaDtVqP8iNp2D/RXaqRquMRr5DD56uce2+Qph7YCdSy+Fd8qLkoe31/AwcGaNaP FGXspH8ZqP4qhhF3SzZONjennGwYvmN9y7IuHbwDvY5eEht8LmFGmkDulOQchKyBfU6j ydtSafunjNkYxWSCcQIcNqO8N9GW5G4UBvHU6yMostN7JB+L4Dq6orMKLXoSTH6aem4j kjwI7E78W0ny5CeTjh+eUNlprm4P6S2712sE3jFDXlo8Np9YG7fAEOYdXqa4BuDUwCuV jIjayvaTpE/b8P6JGp8jxjUSPMyy1Vl+6njuVppuvntdgM4dZ6Z5pmTnEAunqJRfgYK8 Wcbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xIKsO4z+A43hGxaSkRrNSGJpdpdNhflGXSiphLJzUNU=; b=LBlrccXD44xfejpyZhFHhkZHrkne8otqXyhbID/bYicv5g7Jy387fCD7jnKQQMNt3q NxsIXL5WgMBzB5UhonMzQTyQ8tJzCf7LWvAFKBQMTiSl1jATiDw5PmpJiflT+KIy8xjp HaM81cG7Ip+8vftbvYkx1asOJNhjAgvYE6E31Ci9t88MjLzpbELVPDQEPG9smnH2rU4l 3WkoSZAZVR9JmIPaUTPfnuiF1JNVrVv07T5XQFXQQaAbRc001GAk1Sz9BYyO+nLye+RI bErCACkCh5ViyTkb2wIah8HHNFYdsEDSCYLFXriY+2lka6JZHARkD+Nr3dIasQ8FZVUA ktCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKLeUbz7Ti7zxt+BLHW7KTri6TasVXOrxzWNZUmCv2ejyXY85LeE4WJwp5KHb9Xrg== X-Received: by 10.25.137.215 with SMTP id l206mr9805505lfd.140.1458618925460; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.15] (broadband-46-242-29-57.nationalcablenetworks.ru. [46.242.29.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm4681149lbs.37.2016.03.21.20.55.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: ioo: ad9832: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' To: Greg KH References: <20160321153351.GA16781@pal-comp> <20160322015243.GB27510@kroah.com> Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com From: Svetlana Orlik Message-ID: <56F0C22A.1030807@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:55:22 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160322015243.GB27510@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 22.03.2016 04:52, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Svetlana Orlik wrote: >> Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' to avoid checkpatch.pl warning. >> >> Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> Send patch using mutt. >> v1 patch was sent using Google Groups web interface. >> Not sure it works. > > Not sure what works? The subject line still is incorrect. > > Did you test-build the patch? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Hi,Greg! To be clear, I was 'not sure' the Google Groups web interface will do the right job, when I was using it to post the patch (v1). And it didn't. Yes, I did test-build the patch with 'make drivers/staging/iio/frequency/*'. Will correct the subject right away. Sveta.