From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiUa6-0001dl-Id for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:15:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiUa3-0000IJ-BU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:15:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]:36651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiUa3-0000Hk-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:15:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l68so95884wml.3 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1456151945-11225-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1456151945-11225-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87a8lr27b7.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <56F013EF.1000401@redhat.com> <8737rj7npp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56F1C3F1.9060406@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:15:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8737rj7npp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: detach devices from DriveInfo at unrealize time List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz On 21/03/2016 18:19, Markus Armbruster wrote: > I think only if some our users actually expect the alternate wart can we > seriosuly consider switching, because then we have to choose between two > breakages anyway: > > * We can stick to the current wart, and leave these users broken. > > * We can switch to the alternate wart, unbreak these users, and break > the users that expect the current wart. > > Without further evidence on who expects what, I'd stick to the current > wart. I certainly would expect nvme to behave the same as virtio-blk, for one. Paolo