From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aio7H-0007PQ-Bx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:06:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aio7G-0008Dm-Co for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:06:51 -0400 References: <1458154485-32536-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <20160317134417.GA4833@noname.redhat.com> From: Max Reitz Message-ID: <56F2E93A.30500@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:06:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160317134417.GA4833@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ALWDhatKB89NwusLah8GSOQMM0pvVSqPg" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/17] blockdev: Further BlockBackend work List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ALWDhatKB89NwusLah8GSOQMM0pvVSqPg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="iqK6gP0XXMtqTeaqO6s7r6rLNTIDmf98u" From: Max Reitz To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , Eric Blake Message-ID: <56F2E93A.30500@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] blockdev: Further BlockBackend work References: <1458154485-32536-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <20160317134417.GA4833@noname.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20160317134417.GA4833@noname.redhat.com> --iqK6gP0XXMtqTeaqO6s7r6rLNTIDmf98u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17.03.2016 14:44, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.03.2016 um 19:54 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: >> This series appears to reinvent itself with every revision. This time,= >> its main implication is that BBs are no longer automatically treated a= s >> monitor-owned, and that a BB's name is tightly tied to the monitor >> reference (it is considered equivalent to that reference). >=20 > Thanks, applied to the block branch. Great. :-) >> v4: >> - blk_hide_on_behalf_of_hmp_drive_del() does a bit more than what >> monitor_remove_blk() does; namely, it invokes bdrv_make_anon() on th= e >> BDS. We should probably continue to do so. >=20 > Probably not, removing the node-name of a BDS just because a BB > disappears certainly feels like a bug. Even more so now that node-names= > are auto-generated and the general assumption is that all BDSes have > one. Yes, I meant in the sense of "It's what we did so far and I don't want to mess with it in this series". Max > But that's a preexisting problem, so we can fix it on top. >=20 > Kevin >=20 --iqK6gP0XXMtqTeaqO6s7r6rLNTIDmf98u-- --ALWDhatKB89NwusLah8GSOQMM0pvVSqPg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW8uk7AAoJEDuxQgLoOKytJwcH/jk92FRkmTfQW0aFMoPzCVX9 psMvkOO9Lyt1yVNHLW45+TNZuzdoYESrQAKQDE9FJoUT2NC67Ob1vqb7Iue86GHn kU5elUNuphSKuR4WfPPJ6aOG4TMc+vKUX9odLfGyZQCYxayMSWUv2yGSGTiS4dUy 5aiUEzVoWNGRtJSHaJEgupvlnGjMQHJDB2/ghIjBtaH3hykRPJO16Y9X7WmTWVF/ VBK8mh42RJkcDSJn3z+k8tPGoLbUsGOUqJ7Ok9NI40N6xXW3Tv6JR5+GcZGGx3mt 0oQKwAm02QjKCxMkGeXbBg7xs3l80fqp8ghMPLrkBBob1FWDC4xeKNhF7LBh708= =kASz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ALWDhatKB89NwusLah8GSOQMM0pvVSqPg--