All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: optimize steal time calculation
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:08:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F3CA9B.9070403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458127996-21799-1-git-send-email-liangchen.linux@gmail.com>



On 16/03/2016 12:33, Liang Chen wrote:
> Since accumulate_steal_time is now only called in record_steal_time, it
> doesn't quite make sense to put the delta calculation in a separate
> function. The function could be called thousands of times before guest
> enables the steal time MSR (though the compiler may optimize out this
> function call). And after it's enabled, the MSR enable bit is tested twice
> every time. Removing the accumulate_steal_time function also avoids the
> necessity of having the accum_steal field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@canonical.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 19 +++----------------
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 44adbb8..3f460a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	struct {
>  		u64 msr_val;
>  		u64 last_steal;
> -		u64 accum_steal;
>  		struct gfn_to_hva_cache stime;
>  		struct kvm_steal_time steal;
>  	} st;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index eaf6ee8..82bfefc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2002,22 +2002,8 @@ static void kvmclock_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.pv_time_enabled = false;
>  }
>  
> -static void accumulate_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	u64 delta;
> -
> -	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
> -		return;
> -
> -	delta = current->sched_info.run_delay - vcpu->arch.st.last_steal;
> -	vcpu->arch.st.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay;
> -	vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal = delta;
> -}
> -
>  static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	accumulate_steal_time(vcpu);
> -
>  	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -2025,9 +2011,10 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time))))
>  		return;
>  
> -	vcpu->arch.st.steal.steal += vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal;
> +	vcpu->arch.st.steal.steal += current->sched_info.run_delay -
> +		vcpu->arch.st.last_steal;
> +	vcpu->arch.st.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay;
>  	vcpu->arch.st.steal.version += 2;
> -	vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal = 0;
>  
>  	kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
>  		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
> 

Nice cleanup; queued for 4.7, thanks.

Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-24 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 11:33 [PATCH] KVM: x86: optimize steal time calculation Liang Chen
2016-03-24 11:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F3CA9B.9070403@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gavin.guo@canonical.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.