From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:53:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection In-Reply-To: <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> References: <1458285681-25684-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net> <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> Message-ID: <56FA88DF.20208@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : > On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : >>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device >>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed >>>> through a new device called chipid. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >>>> [nicolas.ferre at atmel.com: remove useless warnings] >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- >> >> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc >> branches: what do you think Alexandre? >> > > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in > line with the code. Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch. patch 3 in the "dt" branch. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:53:35 +0200 Message-ID: <56FA88DF.20208@atmel.com> References: <1458285681-25684-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net> <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160323134750.GC2570-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Ludovic Desroches , plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a =E9crit : > On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a =E9crit : >>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. Th= is device >>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are expos= ed >>>> through a new device called chipid. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >>>> [nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org: remove useless warnings] >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++= ++++++++----- >> >> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-= soc >> branches: what do you think Alexandre? >> >=20 > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in > line with the code. Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch. patch 3 in the "dt" branch. Bye, --=20 Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932217AbcC2Nxm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:53:42 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:45901 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756272AbcC2Nxk (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:53:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection To: Alexandre Belloni References: <1458285681-25684-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net> <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> CC: Ludovic Desroches , , , , , From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel Message-ID: <56FA88DF.20208@atmel.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:53:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : >>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device >>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed >>>> through a new device called chipid. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >>>> [nicolas.ferre@atmel.com: remove useless warnings] >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- >> >> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc >> branches: what do you think Alexandre? >> > > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in > line with the code. Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch. patch 3 in the "dt" branch. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre