All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:35:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FCD332.8000604@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459351827-3346-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>



On 03/30/2016 05:30 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Seen while trying to fix the func_reentrancy autotest. The
> series addresses several issues:
> 
> 1/ Hash and lpm return a pointer to an existing object if the user requests the
>    creation with an already existing name. This look dangerous: when an object
>    is returned, the user does not know if it should be freed or not.
> 
> 2/ There is a race condition in cuckoo_hash as the lock is not held in
>    rte_hash_create(). We could find some cases where NULL is returned when the
>    object already exists (ex: when rte_ring_create() fails).
> 
> 3/ There is a race condition func_reentrancy that can fail even if the tested
>    API behaves correctly.
> 
> 
> Changes since RFC:
> 
> - split the patch in 4 patches
> - on error, set rte_errno to EEXIST when relevant
> - fix locking in cuckoo_hash creation
> 
> Olivier Matz (4):
>   lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail
>   hash: allocation of an existing object should fail
>   hash: keep the list locked at creation
>   autotest: fix func reentrancy
> 
>  app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c   | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  app/test/test_lpm6.c              |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  lib/librte_hash/rte_fbk_hash.c    |  5 ++++-
>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c          | 10 ++++++++--
>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.c         |  5 ++++-
>  6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 

Self-nack, there is a typo in rte_cuckoo_hash.c breaking the
compilation.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15 12:25 [RFC] hash/lpm: return NULL if the object exists Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:32 ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [PATCH 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 21:46     ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-31  7:35       ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-01 16:25         ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-31 10:55       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [PATCH 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [PATCH 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [PATCH 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-03-31  7:35   ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-04-05  7:35   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:05       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:00       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05 11:53     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 15:51       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-06 10:11         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 10:32       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:14         ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 11:20           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:57             ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27       ` [PATCH v4 " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [PATCH v4 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [PATCH v4 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [PATCH v4 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [PATCH v4 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 15:31         ` [PATCH v4 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FCD332.8000604@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.