All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mmc: sdhci: Remove redundant runtime PM calls
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:46:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FE2739.2030100@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459236673-5639-7-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On 29/03/16 10:31, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Commit 9250aea76bfc ("mmc: core: Enable runtime PM management of host
> devices"), made some calls to the runtime PM API from the driver
> redundant. Especially those which deals with runtime PM reference
> counting, so let's remove them.
> 
> Moreover as SDHCI have its own wrapper functions for runtime PM these
> becomes superfluous, so let's remove them as well.
> 
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Looks good, but I have one comment below.

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 56 ++++++------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 8670f16..4bb9bfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -56,19 +56,9 @@ static void sdhci_enable_preset_value(struct sdhci_host *host, bool enable);
>  static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int sdhci_runtime_pm_get(struct sdhci_host *host);
> -static int sdhci_runtime_pm_put(struct sdhci_host *host);
>  static void sdhci_runtime_pm_bus_on(struct sdhci_host *host);
>  static void sdhci_runtime_pm_bus_off(struct sdhci_host *host);
>  #else
> -static inline int sdhci_runtime_pm_get(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -static inline int sdhci_runtime_pm_put(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
>  static void sdhci_runtime_pm_bus_on(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -1298,8 +1288,6 @@ static void sdhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  
>  	host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
> -
>  	/* Firstly check card presence */
>  	present = mmc->ops->get_cd(mmc);
>  
> @@ -1546,9 +1534,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
>  	sdhci_do_set_ios(host, ios);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
>  }
>  
>  static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -1580,12 +1566,8 @@ static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  static int sdhci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -	int ret;
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
> -	ret = sdhci_do_get_cd(host);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
> -	return ret;
> +	return sdhci_do_get_cd(host);
>  }
>  
>  static int sdhci_check_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -1641,12 +1623,8 @@ static void sdhci_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  static int sdhci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -	int ret;
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
> -	ret = sdhci_do_get_ro(host);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
> -	return ret;
> +	return sdhci_do_get_ro(host);
>  }
>  
>  static void sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(struct sdhci_host *host, int enable)
> @@ -1668,7 +1646,7 @@ static void sdhci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(mmc_dev(mmc));

Why can't this be moved into the core as well?  At the least, there should
be a comment here and explanation in the commit message.

>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>  	if (enable)
> @@ -1679,7 +1657,8 @@ static void sdhci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
>  	sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, enable);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
> +	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(mmc_dev(mmc));
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(mmc_dev(mmc));
>  }
>  
>  static int sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct sdhci_host *host,
> @@ -1777,14 +1756,11 @@ static int sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>  	struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -	int err;
>  
>  	if (host->version < SDHCI_SPEC_300)
>  		return 0;
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
> -	err = sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch(host, ios);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
> -	return err;
> +
> +	return sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch(host, ios);
>  }
>  
>  static int sdhci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> @@ -1792,10 +1768,8 @@ static int sdhci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  	u32 present_state;
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
>  	/* Check whether DAT[3:0] is 0000 */
>  	present_state = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
>  
>  	return !(present_state & SDHCI_DATA_LVL_MASK);
>  }
> @@ -1822,7 +1796,6 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  	unsigned int tuning_count = 0;
>  	bool hs400_tuning;
>  
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>  
>  	hs400_tuning = host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
> @@ -1870,7 +1843,6 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  	if (host->ops->platform_execute_tuning) {
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  		err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
> -		sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2002,8 +1974,6 @@ out:
>  	sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
> -
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2201,7 +2171,6 @@ static void sdhci_tasklet_finish(unsigned long param)
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  
>  	mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> -	sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
>  }
>  
>  static void sdhci_timeout_timer(unsigned long data)
> @@ -2682,17 +2651,6 @@ int sdhci_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_resume_host);
>  
> -static int sdhci_runtime_pm_get(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> -	return pm_runtime_get_sync(host->mmc->parent);
> -}
> -
> -static int sdhci_runtime_pm_put(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> -	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->mmc->parent);
> -	return pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->mmc->parent);
> -}
> -
>  static void sdhci_runtime_pm_bus_on(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	if (host->bus_on)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29  7:31 [PATCH 1/8] mmc: atmel-mci: Remove redundant runtime PM calls Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] mmc: mmci: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] mmc: mediatek: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] mmc: omap_hsmmc: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] mmc: sdhci-acpi: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] mmc: sdhci-pci: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] mmc: sdhci: " Ulf Hansson
2016-04-01  7:46   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2016-04-01  9:46     ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-05 11:40       ` Adrian Hunter
2016-04-05 14:38         ` Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29  7:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] mmc: tmio: " Ulf Hansson
2016-03-29 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] mmc: atmel-mci: " Ludovic Desroches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FE2739.2030100@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.