From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:11:27 -0700
Subject: [GIT PULL] nvme fabrics patches for the next round of 4.9 rc
In-Reply-To: <044901d23ba4$a6c59e50$f450daf0$@opengridcomputing.com>
References: <1478678520-26697-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me>
 <950ac71c-1854-017e-a497-bba97138fa98@kernel.dk>
 <044901d23ba4$a6c59e50$f450daf0$@opengridcomputing.com>
Message-ID: <56b11145-78ed-aead-2096-e14747d692fc@kernel.dk>

On 11/10/2016 03:49 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 01:02 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> Hey Jens,
>>>
>>> Mostly some stability fixes for fabrics:
>>> - some memleaks, correctness and verbosity fixes from Bart
>>> - fix command delivery during queue reconnect from Christoph
>>> - nvme rdma reconnect vs io race fix from Christoph and steve
>>> - nvme rdma queue cleanup on connection failure fix from Steve
>>> - nvme rdma target error flow and queue teardown fixes
>>> - nvme rdma queue size fix from Samuel
>>> - nvmet namespace rcu race fix from Sasha
>>>
>>> please pull from:
>>>
>>>   git://git.infradead.org/nvme-fabrics.git nvmf-4.9-rc
>>
>> I'm scanning the list for anything that might NOT be appropriate this
>> late in the cycle, and I see a few:
>>
>>      nvme/scsi: Remove set-but-not-used variables
>>      nvme-fabrics: Adjust source code indentation
>>      nvme-rdma: remove redundant define
>>
>> I can pull this in for 4.10 without hesistation, but I don't want to
>> send a pull request for a fairly new feature with 3 of the commits being
>> cleanups for -rc5.
>>
>> Let me know what you want to do.
>
> It would be great to get the kato/reconnect fixes in 4.9...

Sagi? I'm sending patches for -rc5 tomorrow. Let's get this batch split
in a 4.9 and 4.10 chunk.

-- 
Jens Axboe