From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5FD14E2F6; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 22:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720479118; cv=none; b=EJ02YVrKlOcJkJ7gqzQ1rdOsd17Go7rNvE+EnLfetYMMG7CfwIKzGNBZ9Y8tFVimAYKlFoDRzPw9OgPKE36fPW7ryusb0GPFzxacN/mdhm57fMlAykGUUvwIIdKR+i6Hb78YXe7O3isVn9FtOSDUhfhfelxzfiw4ykcXkywihVg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720479118; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BaeSK8VL0osIikIB9i5thgSjcGWi7CWbmFZlyc7yXoU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qyWNQeRnABKDDVHQEw7l0FozOQJnjjWSzNkYCb638DQHOG14WFg1KdN6zCNLv8YbAn5GZRL6QGs4T0hGDKQ5JckrbWfFmxiwL1diFWciT8Xgn5P4dW8MUZxtQ4a2oj7pBuODSgZnO6eMo/dJHb609jm2tY/yZWMDkYvNFz97I5s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=eVWmoHMJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eVWmoHMJ" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb4a807708so35471755ad.2; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720479116; x=1721083916; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8srVywQNWWPgpGI5XryznETXjclcLlACCGDSu9pPwTw=; b=eVWmoHMJ/uFjCD1HPAzSCqWzojxfQs1la0UA4rq1E/1lt20cWIf88P7hQYuP/u+gEC QDMb32v8EJGXWaqPMxT/UT4EsDhAlS2IZO4Fw+nBdqYNsPGLPc1RNTOxqnxOAfihifDB A9v7EnuvVNm/atrYPvTxRkGLo2eEUtguy5BbmwotE7fwphycXy0N+qvF2ab2J8G3+b2+ tOyi+3rWIoc+joRqYAC/fcnQJYIioM+3pchmyY6d7/cF3d3T+iMkzUAUHx9OfDQ7p2QA AfkMI+jFOBjD/ZDuI1OsJCaNWMzaOPLMWIyfqmZyINvwaPxhKGWckC16IpDSmTTLeN2a dvCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720479116; x=1721083916; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8srVywQNWWPgpGI5XryznETXjclcLlACCGDSu9pPwTw=; b=PVtMycmdM4E/0vLJnzNo8kKwW7z0Zr6l4fw5zWVHxhIaEV+cxyfYjlYZPFbOElhWZp mtMbYJs+IJpch4o0jUQ53xgkM3TV9a6uzK2t/qyJT+oq+y8xDpZFXLeQnhh6LLvvqB9O MrauSC/pDGeMhlipNqgcHFFje3H3/b5FrfaPomhs4YbEXKUja0pXhKxcAL+FxrdTEo5Q cLDwTumKmxDj2OY/XaJKp2xXGsAKQMGFpM4g1ZSdx6jlsWLt2Sgfv3f+Cb81LZ7EbFk0 +mKTeL8ONGBxnHKxRU5QGanketmH2R9zdewz6grF5a6Z+8eUf8hPOAgCFT6x9QQj1oSn V5TA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXXcVe5wR78pZN/vDBOQMM9kFef22z2i+FmPBTgdNEzqDlf4wdUbD7mkf5GwKmluAWFnjsl/HhM07rktCxZaQPfLPVRM5KERsI4KYdhhymK4xvZPuX2+u13Eea16sg8bvKvfH4zYw/SEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1oEBUSwDXmlRO0671EhN2tR3+PPBCrcAdP+9QxeNRqFE4aesA KB4sskVWKR2/JdETvgvptEAlthk1UrC7m3L7q5LpexDFar069mY+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4gALPYWza3/xf9ND9sKmPMlgPWyMMwEpsRiHkm4yhjH+VkTr6mvBRquiS6avJMGz+Qs4CRw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c40e:b0:1fb:80cb:f577 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fbb6d23bdamr5769945ad.5.1720479116408; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.95] ([118.32.98.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1fbb6a11890sm3823825ad.7.2024.07.08.15.51.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <56d2ff54-3c3a-4fb3-8006-72e183faa8bc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:51:51 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/zcrypt: optimize memory allocation in online_show() To: Dan Carpenter , oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, Harald Freudenberger , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle Cc: lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, shjy180909@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Yunseong Kim In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Dan, On 7/9/24 12:55 오전, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hi, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/yskelg-gmail-com/s390-zcrypt-optimize-memory-allocation-in-online_show/20240626-071004 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240623120147.35554-3-yskelg%40gmail.com > patch subject: [PATCH] s390/zcrypt: optimize memory allocation in online_show() > config: s390-randconfig-r081-20240707 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240707/202407071714.4AUEoeUD-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202407071714.4AUEoeUD-lkp@intel.com/ > > smatch warnings: > drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_card.c:103 online_store() warn: iterator used outside loop: 'zq' > > vim +/zq +103 drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_card.c Thank you for the review. I decided not to work on my patch anymore after the review because my patch was problematic and not useful. > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 90 list_for_each_entry(zq, &zc->zqueues, list) > 2ff6be56a27c2d Yunseong Kim 2024-06-23 91 if (!!zq->online != !!online) > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 92 maxzqs++; > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 93 if (maxzqs > 0) > 2ff6be56a27c2d Yunseong Kim 2024-06-23 94 zq_uelist = kcalloc(maxzqs, sizeof(*zq_uelist), GFP_ATOMIC); > e28d2af43614eb Ingo Tuchscherer 2016-08-25 95 list_for_each_entry(zq, &zc->zqueues, list) > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 96 if (zcrypt_queue_force_online(zq, online)) > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 97 if (zq_uelist) { > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 98 zcrypt_queue_get(zq); > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 99 zq_uelist[i++] = zq; > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 100 } > e28d2af43614eb Ingo Tuchscherer 2016-08-25 101 spin_unlock(&zcrypt_list_lock); > 2ff6be56a27c2d Yunseong Kim 2024-06-23 102 while (i--) { > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 @103 ap_send_online_uevent(&zq->queue->ap_dev, online); > ^^ > zq is an invalid pointer here. It's an offset off the list head. > There used to be a "zq = zq_uelist[i];" before this function call but > the patch deleted it. My patch doesn't mean much to me at this point, but if it needed to be fixed, I think it should have been. > 2ff6be56a27c2d Yunseong Kim 2024-06-23 104 zcrypt_queue_put(zq_uelist[i]); > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 105 } > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 106 kfree(zq_uelist); > df6f508c68dbc6 Harald Freudenberger 2021-04-13 107 > e28d2af43614eb Ingo Tuchscherer 2016-08-25 108 return count; > e28d2af43614eb Ingo Tuchscherer 2016-08-25 109 } I've been doing some Linux kernel research on the IBM Cloud s390x VPC and running syzkaller and Linux kernel tests tools to send out useful patches. :) Warm regards, Yunseong kim