From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v2 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:50:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56ec31af-4468-4445-aa19-01f407100def@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1993725f-b6d6-4ec6-8fa8-3d64368040be@kernel.org>
On 19/09/2025 12:47, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
>
> On 19/09/2025 12:15, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> On Tue, 2025-09-16 at 13:01 +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
>>> When servers set the C-flag in their MP_CAPABLE to tell clients not
>>> to
>>> create subflows to the initial address and port, clients will likely
>>> not
>>> use their other endpoints. That's because the in-kernel path-manager
>>> uses the 'subflow' endpoints to create subflows only to the initial
>>> address and port.
>>>
>>> The first patch fixes that, and the second one validates it.
>>>
>>> More details:
>>> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/536
>>>
>>> Please see the comment in the first patch, and don't hesitate to
>>> reply :)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
>>
>> Thanks for this v2.
>>
>> LGTM!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
>
> Thank you for the review!
>
> Now in our tree. I decided to add them in the section for net-next: we
> are close to the merge window, and linked to the comment from patch 1,
> it is certainly safer to delay the backport to stable a bit.
>
> New patches for t/upstream:
> - 0b324b1e22a0: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag
> - b366bcbbad02: "squashed" patch 1/10 in "mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable
> client side with C-flag"
> - c3ca688abf65: selftests: mptcp: join: validate C-flag + def limit
> - Results: fe9c68017366..8a1a30937c29 (export)
I forgot the last bit:
- Results: fe9c68017366..169aef388767 (export)
Tests are now in progress:
- export:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/df63a09d28d2808cbe27f96a1937ad904035d2d6/checks
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 11:01 [PATCH mptcp-net v2 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-16 11:01 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 1/2] " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-18 16:29 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-19 3:01 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 8:17 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-19 10:14 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-16 11:01 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: validate C-flag + def limit Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-16 13:01 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag MPTCP CI
2025-09-19 10:15 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-19 10:50 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56ec31af-4468-4445-aa19-01f407100def@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.