From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sagig Subject: Re: [PATCH for kernel v4.6] IB/srpt: Revert "Convert to percpu_ida tag allocation" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:13:04 +0300 Message-ID: <570116E0.3010401@gmail.com> References: <56FDBA63.7010804@sandisk.com> <20160401030322.GH2670@leon.nu> <56FDE739.9090801@sandisk.com> <1459655763.13184.45.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1459655763.13184.45.camel-XoQW25Eq2zviZyQQd+hFbcojREIfoBdhmpATvIKMPHk@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Bart Van Assche Cc: "leon-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org" , Doug Ledford , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , target-devel List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Like I said two months ago, there is no reason why ib_srpt needs special > pre-allocation for descriptors containing se_cmd, when every other > single driver in the tree already uses common percpu_ida code for it. It kinda makes sense that ib_srpt would align to what all the rest are doing. I think that fixing the regression with specific assignments would've made more sense than a complete revert... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html