From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <gleb@kernel.org>,
<alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wei@redhat.com>,
<sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v3 10/12] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:14:17 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57038FF9.8090307@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FD08AE.6000201@redhat.com>
Hi Paolo,
On 3/31/16 18:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 31/03/2016 06:15, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> + vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i].ecx &= ~(1 << 21);
>>>
>>> and X86_FEATURE_X2APIC (or something with X2APIC in name) for the
>>> bit.
>>>
>>> The code will become so obvious that the comment can be removed.
>>> :)
>>
>> Good point. I can only find example of using (X86_FEATURE_X2APIC %
>> 32) == 21.
>
> You can use bit(X86_FEATURE_X2APIC), it is defined in arch/x86/kvm/x86.h.
Ahh, thanks.
>
>>> but the MSR interface is going to exit and host-side interrupt
>>> delivery will probably still work, so I don't see a huge problem
>>> with it.
>>
>> Agree that it will still work. However, in such case, the guest code
>> would likely default to using x2APIC interface, which will not be
>> handled by the AVIC hardware, and resulting in no performance
>> improvement that we are trying to introduce.
>
> You would still get some improvement from exit-free interrupt delivery.
Let me look into this and investigate some more.
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 6:09 [PART1 RFC v3 00/12] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 01/12] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to expose helper functions Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 02/12] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VM init/uninit hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-29 5:27 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-29 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-29 11:47 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-30 10:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-30 12:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-30 12:18 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 03/12] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 04/12] KVM: split kvm_vcpu_wake_up from kvm_vcpu_kick Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 05/12] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 06/12] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 07/12] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-05 13:26 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-05 15:56 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 08/12] KVM: x86: Add trace events for AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-28 11:27 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 09/12] svm: Add VMEXIT handlers " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 10/12] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 20:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-31 4:15 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-31 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-05 10:14 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 11/12] svm: Do not intercept CR8 " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 21:10 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-30 12:15 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 21:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-31 8:52 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-31 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-05 10:07 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-05 14:56 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-06 3:40 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-06 12:36 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57038FF9.8090307@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.