From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PREEMPT-RT] [PATCH] s390/cpum_sf: Remove superfluous SMP function call References: <1459765640-13599-1-git-send-email-anna-maria@linutronix.de> <20160405104912.GC3937@osiris> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Message-ID: <57039DC2.6090907@linutronix.de> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:13:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160405104912.GC3937@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Heiko Carstens , Anna-Maria Gleixner Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rt@linutronix.de List-ID: On 04/05/2016 12:49 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c >> @@ -1510,7 +1510,6 @@ static void cpumf_measurement_alert(stru >> static int cpumf_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, >> unsigned long action, void *hcpu) >> { >> - unsigned int cpu = (long) hcpu; >> int flags; >> >> /* Ignore the notification if no events are scheduled on the PMU. >> @@ -1523,11 +1522,15 @@ static int cpumf_pmu_notifier(struct not >> case CPU_ONLINE: >> case CPU_DOWN_FAILED: >> flags = PMC_INIT; >> - smp_call_function_single(cpu, setup_pmc_cpu, &flags, 1); >> + local_irq_disable(); >> + setup_pmc_cpu(&flags); >> + local_irq_enable(); >> break; > > ...but at least the CPU_DOWN_FAILED callback will not necessarily be called > on the cpu that couldn't be brought offline. I don't follow. Sebastian