Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Refactor duplicate object vmap functions

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>]

On 05/04/16 13:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We now have two implementations for vmapping a whole object, one for
> dma-buf and one for the ringbuffer. If we couple the vmapping into the
> obj->pages lifetime, then we can reuse an obj->vmapping for both and at
> the same time couple it into the shrinker.

I suppose Dave could respin the "vmap_range" helper on top of this 
series to further consolidate cmd parser and i915_gem_object_pin_vmap.

> v2: Mark the failable kmalloc() as __GFP_NOWARN (vsyrjala)
> v3: Call unpin_vmap from the right dmabuf unmapper
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         | 12 +++++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  | 49 ++++-----------------------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 26 ++---------------
>   4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 6443745d4182..5fedb1b7d8d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2167,10 +2167,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>   		struct scatterlist *sg;
>   		int last;
>   	} get_page;
> -
> -	/* prime dma-buf support */
> -	void *dma_buf_vmapping;
> -	int vmapping_count;
> +	void *vmapping;
>
>   	/** Breadcrumb of last rendering to the buffer.
>   	 * There can only be one writer, but we allow for multiple readers.
> @@ -2985,12 +2982,19 @@ static inline void i915_gem_object_pin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   	BUG_ON(obj->pages == NULL);
>   	obj->pages_pin_count++;
>   }
> +
>   static inline void i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	BUG_ON(obj->pages_pin_count == 0);
>   	obj->pages_pin_count--;
>   }
>
> +void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_vmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> +static inline void i915_gem_object_unpin_vmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> +	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> +}
> +
>   int __must_check i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct drm_device *dev);
>   int i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>   			 struct intel_engine_cs *to,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 40f90c7e718a..be4cf13343d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2232,6 +2232,11 @@ i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   	 * lists early. */
>   	list_del(&obj->global_list);
>
> +	if (obj->vmapping) {
> +		vunmap(obj->vmapping);
> +		obj->vmapping = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>   	ops->put_pages(obj);
>   	obj->pages = NULL;
>
> @@ -2400,6 +2405,46 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +void *i915_gem_object_pin_vmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)

Kerneldoc would be cool, if for nothing then for the return value.

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +

lockdep_assert_held maybe?

> +	ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(obj);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
> +
> +	if (obj->vmapping == NULL) {
> +		struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
> +		struct page **pages;
> +		int n;
> +
> +		n = obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		pages = kmalloc(n*sizeof(*pages), GFP_TEMPORARY | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +		if (pages == NULL)
> +			pages = drm_malloc_ab(n, sizeof(*pages));
> +		if (pages != NULL) {
> +			n = 0;
> +			for_each_sg_page(obj->pages->sgl, &sg_iter, obj->pages->nents, 0)
> +				pages[n++] = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
> +
> +			obj->vmapping = vmap(pages, n, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> +			if (obj->vmapping == NULL) {
> +				i915_gem_shrink_all(to_i915(obj->base.dev));

Won't the shrinker already run via the new notifier? Why call it again 
and for all objects this time?

Also, act on the return value before retrying vmap?

> +				obj->vmapping = vmap(pages, n, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> +			}
> +			drm_free_large(pages);
> +		}
> +		if (obj->vmapping == NULL) {
> +			i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return obj->vmapping;
> +}
> +
>   void i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
>   			     struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>   {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> index b7d46800c49f..8d8feadee18c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> @@ -108,51 +108,17 @@ static void *i915_gem_dmabuf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf)
>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dma_buf);
>   	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> -	struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
> -	struct page **pages;
> -	int ret, i;
> +	void *addr;
> +	int ret;
>
>   	ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> -	if (obj->dma_buf_vmapping) {
> -		obj->vmapping_count++;
> -		goto out_unlock;
> -	}
> -
> -	ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(obj);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> -
> -	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
> -
> -	ret = -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	pages = drm_malloc_ab(obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT, sizeof(*pages));
> -	if (pages == NULL)
> -		goto err_unpin;
> -
> -	i = 0;
> -	for_each_sg_page(obj->pages->sgl, &sg_iter, obj->pages->nents, 0)
> -		pages[i++] = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
> -
> -	obj->dma_buf_vmapping = vmap(pages, i, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> -	drm_free_large(pages);
> -
> -	if (!obj->dma_buf_vmapping)
> -		goto err_unpin;
> -
> -	obj->vmapping_count = 1;
> -out_unlock:
> +	addr = i915_gem_object_pin_vmap(obj);
>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	return obj->dma_buf_vmapping;
>
> -err_unpin:
> -	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> -err:
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	return addr;
>   }
>
>   static void i915_gem_dmabuf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, void *vaddr)
> @@ -161,12 +127,7 @@ static void i915_gem_dmabuf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, void *vaddr)
>   	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
>
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	if (--obj->vmapping_count == 0) {
> -		vunmap(obj->dma_buf_vmapping);
> -		obj->dma_buf_vmapping = NULL;
> -
> -		i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> -	}
> +	i915_gem_object_unpin_vmap(obj);
>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index c6ae92529fdc..42db699cf326 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2078,35 +2078,13 @@ static int init_phys_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   void intel_unpin_ringbuffer_obj(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
>   {
>   	if (HAS_LLC(ringbuf->obj->base.dev) && !ringbuf->obj->stolen)
> -		vunmap(ringbuf->virtual_start);
> +		i915_gem_object_unpin_vmap(ringbuf->obj);
>   	else
>   		iounmap(ringbuf->virtual_start);
> -	ringbuf->virtual_start = NULL;
>   	ringbuf->vma = NULL;
>   	i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ringbuf->obj);
>   }
>
> -static u32 *vmap_obj(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> -{
> -	struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
> -	struct page **pages;
> -	void *addr;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	pages = drm_malloc_ab(obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT, sizeof(*pages));
> -	if (pages == NULL)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	i = 0;
> -	for_each_sg_page(obj->pages->sgl, &sg_iter, obj->pages->nents, 0)
> -		pages[i++] = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
> -
> -	addr = vmap(pages, i, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> -	drm_free_large(pages);
> -
> -	return addr;
> -}
> -
>   int intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj(struct drm_device *dev,
>   				     struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
>   {
> @@ -2124,7 +2102,7 @@ int intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj(struct drm_device *dev,
>   		if (ret)
>   			goto err_unpin;
>
> -		ringbuf->virtual_start = vmap_obj(obj);
> +		ringbuf->virtual_start = i915_gem_object_pin_vmap(obj);
>   		if (ringbuf->virtual_start == NULL) {
>   			ret = -ENOMEM;
>   			goto err_unpin;
>

Minus the questions above looks good.

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx