From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: "Per Förlin" <per.forlin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Don't increase 8021x_cnt for dropped packets
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:50:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57058490.9090902@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC0pXTKtAPmK74E1ue1YUhS9YgFb0_NWC3veNQXrwvoPhyG=sw@mail.gmail.com>
On 6-4-2016 17:56, Per Förlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me,
>
> * Chip: chip 43340 rev 2 pmurev 20
> * I'm running kernel 4.1 (backports) for the wireless parts
> * I have not to setup my environment for the latest kernel yet.
> It's on my todo list.
>
> Looking at the code you pointed out I realize my fix i misplaced.
> It's strange that I don't end up with a negative count since
> the counter would be decreased twice, with my patch in place.
> I took a closer look at the execution flow and made the following
> observation:
>
> The eh->h_proto has changed when reaching the txfinalize() function.
> This only happens in case of packet drop.
>
> Simplified execution flow.
>
> brcmf_fws_process_skb():
> # At this point ntohs(eh->h_proto) == 0x888E (ETH_P_PAE)
> rc = brcmf_proto_txdata() ->
> brcmf_proto_bcdc_txdata() ->
> brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata()
> # At this point it has changed to: ntohs(eh->h_proto) == 0x8939 (?)
How did you check this? The skb->data pointer is moved here [1] as we
need to prepend a protocol header. So probably you did not map 'eh'
variable over the correct data portion.
Regards,
Arend
[1]
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c#L2708
> if (rc < 0)
> # When executing this function the cnt will not be decreased due to
> # eh->h_proto being changed.
> brcmf_txfinalize()
>
> I need to continue my investigation to find out why the h_proto got changed.
> I assume this is not an expected behavior?
>
> BR
> Per
>
>
> 2016-04-06 10:22 GMT+02:00 Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>:
>> On 5-4-2016 22:01, per.forlin@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> The pend_8021x_cnt gets into a state where it's not being decreased.
>>> When the brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x is called it will timeout
>>> because there are no pending packets to be consumed. There is no
>>> easy way of getting out of this state once it has happened.
>>> Preventing the counter from being increased in case of dropped
>>> packets seem like a reasonable solution.
>>>
>>> Log showing overflow txq and increased cnt:
>>>
>>> // Extra debug prints
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x] pend_8021x_cnt == 0
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_start_xmit] pend_8021x_cnt == 1
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_start_xmit] pend_8021x_cnt == 2
>>>
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>>>
>>> // Extra debug prints
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_start_xmit] pend_8021x_cnt == 3
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_start_xmit] pend_8021x_cnt == 4
>>> brcmfmac: [brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x] pend_8021x_cnt == 4
>>>
>>> WARNING: at .../brcmfmac/core.c:1289 brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x
>>> (warn_slowpath_common)
>>> (warn_slowpath_null)
>>> (brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x [brcmfmac])
>>> (send_key_to_dongle [brcmfmac])
>>> (brcmf_cfg80211_del_key [brcmfmac])
>>> (nl80211_del_key [cfg80211])
>>> (genl_rcv_msg)
>>> (netlink_rcv_skb)
>>> (genl_rcv)
>>> (netlink_unicast)
>>> (netlink_sendmsg)
>>> (sock_sendmsg)
>>> (___sys_sendmsg)
>>> (__sys_sendmsg)
>>> (SyS_sendmsg)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> I came across this bug in an older kernel but it seems relevant
>>> for the latest kernel as well. I'm not familiar with the code
>>> but I can reproduce the issue and verify a fix for it.
>>> With this patch I no longer get stuck with a pend8021_cnt > 0.
>>>
>>> Change log:
>>> v2 - Add variable to know whether the counter is increased or not
>>
>> Sorry for the late response. Can you elaborate where you are seeing this.
>>
>> What kind of chipset are you using?
>> What kernel version are you running?
>>
>> The function brcmf_fws_process_skb() should call brcmf_txfinalize() in
>> case of an error and it does in latest kernel. There the count is
>> decreased. We had an issue mapping to the right ifp as reported by
>> Rafał, but that has also been fixed recently. So main question here:
>>
>> Do you see the issue in the latest kernel?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arend
>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>>> index ed9998b..de80ad8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>>> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t brcmf_netdev_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> struct brcmf_if *ifp = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> struct brcmf_pub *drvr = ifp->drvr;
>>> struct ethhdr *eh = (struct ethhdr *)(skb->data);
>>> + bool pend_8021x_cnt_increased = false;
>>>
>>> brcmf_dbg(DATA, "Enter, bsscfgidx=%d\n", ifp->bsscfgidx);
>>>
>>> @@ -233,14 +234,18 @@ static netdev_tx_t brcmf_netdev_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> goto done;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (eh->h_proto == htons(ETH_P_PAE))
>>> + if (eh->h_proto == htons(ETH_P_PAE)) {
>>> atomic_inc(&ifp->pend_8021x_cnt);
>>> + pend_8021x_cnt_increased = true;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> ret = brcmf_fws_process_skb(ifp, skb);
>>>
>>> done:
>>> if (ret) {
>>> ifp->stats.tx_dropped++;
>>> + if (pend_8021x_cnt_increased)
>>> + atomic_dec(&ifp->pend_8021x_cnt);
>>> } else {
>>> ifp->stats.tx_packets++;
>>> ifp->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 20:01 [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Don't increase 8021x_cnt for dropped packets per.forlin
2016-04-06 8:22 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-04-06 15:56 ` Per Förlin
2016-04-06 21:50 ` Arend Van Spriel [this message]
2016-04-06 23:57 ` Per Förlin
2016-04-07 0:44 ` Per Förlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57058490.9090902@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.