From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH - alsa-lib 1/1] Change card/pid get
 functions to return -ENOSYS if the kernel is too old
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:56:28 +0200
Message-ID: <5707AA7C.5030804@perex.cz>
References: <1459532030-6387-1-git-send-email-agoode@google.com>
 <20160401211558.GA20661@mail.zuhause> <s5hpou5a0g0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <CAOf41NmK6V1MMUrQ=UwO=nttYuk3a5b63jH5VTBxeJM9px1yow@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160407201041.GB26683@mail.zuhause> <s5hpou0mm87.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mail1.perex.cz (mail1.perex.cz [77.48.224.245])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DE6265132
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Fri,  8 Apr 2016 14:56:29 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <s5hpou0mm87.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Martin Koegler <martin.koegler@chello.at>
Cc: Adam Goode <agoode@google.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Dne 8.4.2016 v 12:24 Takashi Iwai napsal(a):
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:10:41 +0200,
> Martin Koegler wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:23:01PM -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
>>> Have you heard any objections?
>>>
>>> Also, would you plan to do a 1.1.2 release soon after accepting this, to
>>> get this functionality out quickly?
>>
>> Distributions already start to pick 1.1.1 up:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/382608
>> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/382611
>>
>> I would object merging that patch, if there is no immediate patched 1.1.2 release available, 
>> as otherwise 1.1.1 with a different API will get used by the mass. 
> 
> I have no strong opinion on this, so far.  Either way (a quick 1.1.2
> fix release, or introducing a new function in 1.1.2) isn't a big
> deal.  Maybe the former is easier, but the latter is safer.
> 
> Jaroslav, what's your take?
> (And no, let's not use the versioned symbols again :)

What about 1.1.1.2 ? This + "pcm_plugin: fix appl pointer not correct
when mmap_commit() return error" patch ?

					Jaroslav

-- 
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.