From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Does __KERNEL_DS serve a purpose?
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <5707E681.7040202@redhat.com>
References: <CALCETrWHHUsd=VXUXQvdeODFFBEDr9EUQQTJ3oWbtO8aHgd3Xw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5707654F.1060407@citrix.com>
 <CALCETrXeU7oi9F+k+mrjV=jo9TW9ic8tOA094j9mbyrX12Jazw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	xen-devel <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXeU7oi9F+k+mrjV=jo9TW9ic8tOA094j9mbyrX12Jazw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org



On 08/04/2016 18:00, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> But %ss can be loaded with 0 on 64-bit kernels.  (I assume that
> loading 0 into %ss sets SS.DPL to 0 if done at CPL0, but I'm vague on
> this, since it only really matters to hypervisor code AFAIK.)

It's even simpler, unless CPL=0 SS cannot be loaded with 0 while in a
64-bit code segment (SS can never be loaded with 0 if you're not in a
64-bit code segment).

Thus indeed SS=0 implies SS.DPL=0 on 64-bit kernels.

Paolo

> 32-bit kernels need __KERNEL_DS, I think.