From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:43:42 +0200 Message-ID: <570B8DEE.2020804@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:51144 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085AbcDKLnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:43:46 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler Hi Yehuda, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/h= ammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#n= ote-46).=20 One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related = to how ansible installs Amazon::S3 The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/l= oic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/ There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.cep= h.com:8081/?branch=3Dhammer&suite=3Drgw as well but they are tainted by= http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by = https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/h= ammer backports. Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round= of testing ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html