All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.7] x86/pv: Correctly fold vIOPL back into vcpu_guest_context
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:08:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570BAFFA.5010406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460365435-12325-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

On 04/11/2016 05:03 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> c/s f71ecb6 "x86: introduce a new VMASSIST for architectural behaviour of
> iopl" shifted the vcpu iopl field by 12, but didn't update the logic which
> reconstructs the guests eflags for migration.
>
> Existing guest kernels set a vIOPL of 1, to prevent them from faulting when
> accessing IO ports.  This bug manifests as a crash after migrate, as the vIOPL
> reverts back to the default of 0, and the guest suffers an unexpected #GP
> fault.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

(save/restore was part of brokenness as well, obviously)

> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> ---
>   xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> index cba1e37..6e709cb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ void arch_get_info_guest(struct vcpu *v, vcpu_guest_context_u c)
>   
>           /* IOPL privileges are virtualised: merge back into returned eflags. */
>           BUG_ON((c(user_regs.eflags) & X86_EFLAGS_IOPL) != 0);
> -        c(user_regs.eflags |= v->arch.pv_vcpu.iopl << 12);
> +        c(user_regs.eflags |= v->arch.pv_vcpu.iopl);
>   
>           if ( !compat )
>           {


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-11 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-11  9:03 [PATCH for-4.7] x86/pv: Correctly fold vIOPL back into vcpu_guest_context Andrew Cooper
2016-04-11  9:45 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-11 14:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-04-11 14:22   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570BAFFA.5010406@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.