All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Persson <lars.persson@axis.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Lars Persson <larper@axis.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sched: do not requeue a NULL skb
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:17:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570BC024.1070504@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460384551.6473.551.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>



On 04/11/2016 04:22 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 15:38 +0200, Lars Persson wrote:
>
>> I though it would be prudent because the queue can be non-empty even for
>> the case of skb=NULL. So should it be there in this patch, another patch
>> or not at all ?
>
> Then maybe change return code ?
>
> It seems strange that a validate_xmit_skb_list() failure stops the
> __qdisc_run() loop but schedules another round.
>
>

It was suggested by Cong Wang to return 0 in order to stop the loop. Do 
you guys agree that the loop should be stopped for such failures ? Then 
I will put the schedule call inside the if as you proposed earlier.

- Lars

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-11 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-11  6:24 [PATCH net v2] net: sched: do not requeue a NULL skb Lars Persson
2016-04-11 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 13:38   ` Lars Persson
2016-04-11 14:22     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 15:17       ` Lars Persson [this message]
2016-04-11 15:52         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 18:02           ` Cong Wang
2016-04-11 18:26             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 18:30               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 23:19                 ` Cong Wang
2016-04-11 23:48                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-11 17:53         ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570BC024.1070504@axis.com \
    --to=lars.persson@axis.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=larper@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.