From: Julian Taylor <jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: enospace regression in 4.4
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:52:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570D19D9.8030702@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570CCCFB.5000104@googlemail.com>
smaller testcase that shows the immediate enospc after fallocate -> rm,
though I don't know if it is really related to the full filesystem
bugging out as the balance does work if you wait a few seconds after the
balance.
But this sequence of commands did work in 4.2.
$ sudo btrfs fi show /dev/mapper/lvm-testing
Label: none uuid: 25889ba9-a957-415a-83b0-e34a62cb3212
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 225.18MiB
devid 1 size 5.00GiB used 788.00MiB path /dev/mapper/lvm-testing
$ fallocate -l 4.4G test.dat
$ rm -f test.dat
$ sudo btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 .
ERROR: error during balancing '.': No space left on device
There may be more info in syslog - try dmesg | tail
On 04/12/2016 12:24 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
> hi,
> I have a system with two filesystems which are both affected by the
> notorious enospace bug when there is plenty of unallocated space
> available. The system is a raid0 on two 900 GiB disks and an iscsi
> single/dup 1.4TiB.
> To deal with the problem I use a cronjob that uses fallocate to give me
> an advance notice on the issue so I can apply the only workaround that
> works for me, which is shrink the fs to the minimum and grow it again.
> This has worked fine for a couple of month.
>
> I now updated from 4.2 to 4.4.6 and it appears my cronjob actually
> triggers an immediate enospc in the balance after removing the
> fallocated file and the shrink/resize workaround does not work anymore.
> it is mounted with enospc_debug but that just says "2 enospc in
> balance". Nothing else useful in the log.
>
> I had to revert back to 4.2 to get the system running again so it is
> currently not available for more testing, but I may be able to do more
> tests if required in future.
>
> The cronjob does this once a day:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> sync
>
> check() {
> date
> mnt=$1
> time btrfs fi balance start -mlimit=2 $mnt
> btrfs fi balance start -dusage=5 $mnt
> sync
> freespace=$(df -B1 $mnt | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $4 -
> 50*1024*1024*1024}')
> fallocate -l $freespace $mnt/falloc
> /usr/sbin/filefrag $mnt/falloc
> rm -f $mnt/falloc
> btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 $mnt
>
> time btrfs fi balance start -mlimit=2 $mnt
> time btrfs fi balance start -dlimit=10 $mnt
> date
> }
>
> check /data
> check /data/nas
>
>
> btrfs info:
>
>
> ~ $ btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.4
> sagan5 ~ $ sudo btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: e4aef349-7a56-4287-93b1-79233e016aae
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 898.18GiB
> devid 1 size 880.00GiB used 473.03GiB path /dev/mapper/data-linear1
> devid 2 size 880.00GiB used 473.03GiB path /dev/mapper/data-linear2
>
> Label: none uuid: 14040f9b-53c8-46cf-be6b-35de746c3153
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 557.19GiB
> devid 1 size 1.36TiB used 585.95GiB path /dev/sdd
>
> ~ $ sudo btrfs fi df /data
> Data, RAID0: total=938.00GiB, used=895.09GiB
> System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=112.00KiB
> Metadata, RAID1: total=4.00GiB, used=3.10GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
> sagan5 ~ $ sudo btrfs fi usage /data
> Overall:
> Device size: 1.72TiB
> Device allocated: 946.06GiB
> Device unallocated: 813.94GiB
> Device missing: 0.00B
> Used: 901.27GiB
> Free (estimated): 856.85GiB (min: 449.88GiB)
> Data ratio: 1.00
> Metadata ratio: 2.00
> Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
>
> Data,RAID0: Size:938.00GiB, Used:895.09GiB
> /dev/dm-1 469.00GiB
> /dev/mapper/data-linear1 469.00GiB
>
> Metadata,RAID1: Size:4.00GiB, Used:3.09GiB
> /dev/dm-1 4.00GiB
> /dev/mapper/data-linear1 4.00GiB
>
> System,RAID1: Size:32.00MiB, Used:112.00KiB
> /dev/dm-1 32.00MiB
> /dev/mapper/data-linear1 32.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
> /dev/dm-1 406.97GiB
> /dev/mapper/data-linear1 406.97GiB
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 10:24 enospace regression in 4.4 Julian Taylor
2016-04-12 15:52 ` Julian Taylor [this message]
2016-04-12 18:09 ` Henk Slager
2016-04-12 19:01 ` Julian Taylor
2016-04-13 3:13 ` Duncan
2016-04-13 11:56 ` Henk Slager
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570D19D9.8030702@googlemail.com \
--to=jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.