Hi Andrew

On 04/12/2016 06:11 PM, Andrzej Zaborowski wrote:
> On 13 April 2016 at 01:06, Andrzej Zaborowski
> <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 13 April 2016 at 00:25, Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can we special case the building of this variant for gvariant based
>>> messages?  Similar to how we're generating the signature on the fly in the
>>> builder?
>>
>> Is it worth it though, just to save a memcpy?
>
> BTW we still need to add the offset after the variant, which is the
> header size, so it wouldn't save the memcpy.
>

Yikes, these people are more insane than I thought ;)

Why do they insist on:
"When transmitting over kdbus, the entire content of the header (all 
parts up to and including the extended header dictionary) must be 
transmitted inside of the first payload item (either vector or memfd). 
The content may be merged with the body (or part of the body) into the 
same item, but the entire header must appear entirely within the first 
item. "

If the actual field length is only known WAAAY later?

Anyway, can we add the offsets inside builder_finalize again.  Or 
alternatively as a separate KDBUS_ITEM?

Regards,
-Denis