From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: [Ceph-qa] ceph-qa-suite branching (merge it into ceph.git?) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:17:59 -0700 Message-ID: <570EB787.9090208@redhat.com> References: <570E4843.8000102@dachary.org> <570EA842.4060105@redhat.com> <570EB571.10907@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56096 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbcDMVSD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:18:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <570EB571.10907@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary , Sage Weil , Samuel Just Cc: John Spray , Ceph Development , ceph-qa On 04/13/2016 02:09 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 13/04/2016 22:12, Josh Durgin wrote: >> On 04/13/2016 11:38 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Samuel Just wrote: >>>> It also doesn't seem like it would actually present a problem in any case. >>> >>> The reason we didn't do this before was because we wanted to revise tests >>> independently of the thing being tested. But as John points out, >>> specifying a test branch should accomplish that, at least for testing. >>> >>> It might be nice to preserve the ability specify an alternate repo with >>> totally out-of-tree tests. Maybe that can be done with a simple reorg of >>> the repo, like putting everything under qa/, so that tasks/ and suites/ >>> don't appear at the top level (of ceph.git or ceph-qa-suite.git). >> >> It'll also be quite helpful to specify an alternate repo (not just >> branch) for testing suite changes without pushing to the main ceph.git >> and triggering gitbuilder builds. > > We can keep the current --ceph-qa-suite-git-url argument for that. Or do you have something else in mind ? I wasn't aware of that - looks like it's just a teuthology-openstack option. I was thinking we should have the same option for teuthology-suite.