From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos7: Don't gate CMU_{CCORE, FSYS0} blocks clock To: Alim Akhtar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com References: <1460608972-13878-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> Cc: thomas.ab@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <570F4BE0.1010102@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:50:56 +0200 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1460608972-13878-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: On 04/14/2016 06:42 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > This patch adds CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag to ACLK_CCORE_133 and ACLK_FSYS0_200 > clocks. These clocks are critical for accessing CMU_CCORE and CMU_FSYS0 > blocks registers. Let these clocks to be enabled all the time. > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos7.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:50:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos7: Don't gate CMU_{CCORE, FSYS0} blocks clock In-Reply-To: <1460608972-13878-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> References: <1460608972-13878-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> Message-ID: <570F4BE0.1010102@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/14/2016 06:42 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > This patch adds CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag to ACLK_CCORE_133 and ACLK_FSYS0_200 > clocks. These clocks are critical for accessing CMU_CCORE and CMU_FSYS0 > blocks registers. Let these clocks to be enabled all the time. > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos7.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof