From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: SMMU problem found on LS2085A with 4.6-rc3
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:04:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570F8739.1060508@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570E9EA9.2070903@linaro.org>
Hi Yang,
On 13/04/16 20:31, Shi, Yang wrote:
> Hi Will & Robin,
>
> I just ran some quick test on my LS2085A board, which has 8 Cortex A57
> cores, with 4.6-rc3 kernel, but I found a regression issue with SMMU.
>
> SMMU driver reports:
>
> arm_smmu_global_fault: 297974 callbacks suppressed
> arm_smmu_global_fault: 298561 callbacks suppressed
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: GFSR 0x80000004, GFSYNR0 0x00000008,
> GFSYNR1 0x00000300, GFSYNR2 0x00000000
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
> arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Unexpected global fault, this could be serious
That's a stream match conflict fault, so you've somehow got two devices
using the same stream ID attached to different domains, and at least one
of them is trying to do DMA.
> But, it is good with 4.5 kernel. I found the below commit causes it:
>
> commit 9adb95949a343dac53b1cd81dc973b5f815c88d4
> Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Date: Tue Jan 26 18:06:36 2016 +0000
>
> iommu/arm-smmu: Support DMA-API domains
>
> With DMA mapping ops provided by the iommu-dma code, only a minimal
> contribution from the IOMMU driver is needed to create a suitable
> DMA-API domain for them to use. Implement this for the ARM SMMUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> Any idea?
My first guess would be the same thing as [1] - does that patch help?
Beyond that, what does your DT look like? The one in mainline has one
token mmu-masters property which isn't even valid, so nothing ever gets
attached to the SMMU - indeed I've happily booted -rc3 on an LS2085A
earlier this week - so there's clearly something going on there.
More generally, I'd note that the mmu-masters binding will never fully
work on this board - you can get the platform devices to cooperate by
programming the assorted ICID registers to ensure they present unique
stream IDs, but PCI devices cannot work at all because there's no way to
make the stream IDs coming out of the root complex be equal to the PCI
RID in the way it relies on. In that sense, any regression here is quite
likely just a shift from "subtly not working" to "loudly and obnoxiously
not working". Conversely, those reasons have also proved it a really
useful platform for implementing and testing the iommu-map binding[2]
(with an awful hack in the PCI driver to program the lookup table
suitably) :D
Robin.
[1]:http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12810
[2]:http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12454
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-13 19:31 SMMU problem found on LS2085A with 4.6-rc3 Shi, Yang
2016-04-14 12:04 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2016-04-14 23:07 ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-15 12:30 ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-15 17:19 ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-15 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-15 17:55 ` Shi, Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570F8739.1060508@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.