From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:48:41 +0200 Message-ID: <5710AAE9.1020602@dachary.org> References: <570B8DEE.2020804@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp24.services.sfr.fr ([93.17.128.82]:7246 "EHLO smtp24.services.sfr.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751813AbcDOIso (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:48:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <570B8DEE.2020804@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler Ping ? On 11/04/2016 13:43, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Yehuda, >=20 > The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree= /hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692= #note-46).=20 >=20 > One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems relate= d to how ansible installs Amazon::S3 > The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com= /loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/ >=20 > There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.c= eph.com:8081/?branch=3Dhammer&suite=3Drgw as well but they are tainted = by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed b= y https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel= /hammer backports. >=20 > Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own rou= nd of testing ? >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html