From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Michael Fritscher <michael@fritscher.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6] wxx: Fix broken TCP networking (regression)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57111D40.9030908@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160415091516.GD32260@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 876 bytes --]
Am 15.04.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
[...]
>> (Incidentally the original intention in commit c61964406
>> was clearly that callers should need to check only EAGAIN and
>> not EWOULDBLOCK, and for 2.7 we should look at whether we can
>> do that (ie whether all our host OSes really make them the
>> same value, as Linux does and the oslib-win32.c socket_error()
>> function does).)
>
> Fortunately someone has already created a giant table:
>
> http://www.ioplex.com/~miallen/errcmp.html
>
> Aside from Windows, only OSF/1 has different value for EAGAIN & WOULDBLOCK
> and IIUC we don't support QEMU on that platform, so I think we're fine.
AIX 4.3,5.1 uses 11/54, HP-UX 11.22 uses 11/246 for EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK
according to that table.
Is this relevant for QEMU?
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 17:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6] wxx: Fix broken TCP networking (regression) Stefan Weil
2016-04-14 17:53 ` Michael Fritscher
2016-04-14 18:08 ` Samuel Thibault
2016-04-14 18:54 ` Michael Fritscher
2016-04-15 9:35 ` Michael Fritscher
2016-04-14 19:12 ` Peter Maydell
2016-04-15 9:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-04-15 16:56 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2016-04-15 16:59 ` Peter Maydell
2016-04-15 17:52 ` Stefan Weil
2016-04-15 9:11 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57111D40.9030908@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=michael@fritscher.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.