From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] net: designware: fix descriptor layout and warnings on 64-bit archs
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57155711.1000501@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160418213840.GA3707@gmail.com>
On 18.04.16 23:38, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Hmm, this is going to get very interesting with efi_loader support. By
>> default we allocate memory at the highest possible free address, so payloads
>> will probably (unless they specify limits) have their buffers above 32bit on
>> this platform. If we now deny any DMA to them, we basically break I/O
>> access.
>
> I'm not familiar with efi_loader, but on this platform the physical
> RAM is within the 32bit memory range, so I don't think a workaround is
> needed. And I guess probably it's the same for the other 64bit ARM SoC
> using this driver.
So if RAM is always within the lower 32bits, then we don't have a problem.
> BTW, I see that another driver (sunxi_mmc) also truncates the upper 32
> bits of addresses on 64bit platforms. Maybe this issue should be
> addresses in a generic way?
The only 64bit sunxi platform (A64) also only has 32bit physical RAM
addresses.
>> Could you by any chance just use a bounce buffer?
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how to do it? Are there any primitives
> in u-boot to request memory from low addresses?
Thinking about this I don't think we have the memory reservation
logistics to maintain a good bounce buffer. You could create a global
array in bss that you read to / write from, but I'm not sure it's really
worth it.
At the end of the day, if you know that your platform can only ever do
32bit DMA to a physical address range that's only 32bits, it's perfectly
ok IMHO.
We only have a problem if you have a platform that has RAM above 4G and
can only do DMA to 32bit addresses.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 7:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/3] Amlogic Meson GXBaby and ODROID-C2 support Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] net: designware: fix descriptor layout and warnings on 64-bit archs Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 9:56 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-17 11:14 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 20:59 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-18 10:57 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-18 11:06 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-18 21:38 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-18 21:52 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2016-04-25 21:43 ` Joe Hershberger
2016-04-18 11:55 ` Andreas Färber
2016-04-18 22:05 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/3] arm: add initial support for Amlogic Meson and ODROID-C2 Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 7:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] arm: meson: implement calls to secure monitor Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 9:48 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-18 21:50 ` Beniamino Galvani
2016-04-17 10:00 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-18 21:52 ` Beniamino Galvani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57155711.1000501@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.