From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:30448 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168AbcDSJNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:13:20 -0400 Subject: Re: RAID5 Unable to remove Failing HD To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <56BAFC15.6080106@oracle.com> <5714A1F7.3050509@bouton.name> From: Anand Jain Message-ID: <5715F6A0.7030707@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:13:04 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> # btrfs device delete 3 /mnt/store/ >> ERROR: device delete by id failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device >> >> Were the patch sets above for btrfs-progs or for the kernel ? > > Looks like you're primarily interested in the concern2 patches, device > delete by devid. > > A quick search of the list back-history reveals that an updated patch > set, 00/15 now (look for [PATCH 00/15] Device delete by id ), was posted > by dserba on the 15th of February. It was the kernel patches and was > slated for the kernel 4.6 dev cycle. However, the patch set was pulled > at that time due to test failures, tho they were suspected to actually be > from something else. Thanks Duncan. Yep the reported issue did not point to any of the patch in that set. But I am keeping a tab open for new users /test cases, anything that is found will help. By the way, For Lionel issue, delete missing should work ? which does not need any additional patch. Thanks, Anand