From: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
<linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/8] net: core: Another step of skb receive list processing
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57163437.2060002@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5716338E.4050003@solarflare.com>
netif_receive_skb_list_internal() now processes a list and hands it
on to the next function.
The code duplication is unfortunate, but the common part between the list
and non-list versions of the function takes a lock (rcu_read_lock()), so
factoring it out would be a little ugly.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 4bb6724..586807d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4241,6 +4241,14 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
+static void __netif_receive_skb_list(struct sk_buff_head *list)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
+ __netif_receive_skb(skb);
+}
+
static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int ret;
@@ -4269,6 +4277,41 @@ static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
+static void netif_receive_skb_list_internal(struct sk_buff_head *list)
+{
+ struct sk_buff_head sublist;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ __skb_queue_head_init(&sublist);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL) {
+ net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
+ if (skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb)) {
+ /* Handled, don't add to sublist */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+ if (static_key_false(&rps_needed)) {
+ struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
+ int cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
+
+ if (cpu >= 0) {
+ enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
+ /* Handled, don't add to sublist */
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+ __skb_queue_tail(&sublist, skb);
+ }
+
+ __netif_receive_skb_list(&sublist);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return;
+}
+
/**
* netif_receive_skb - process receive buffer from network
* @skb: buffer to process
@@ -4297,8 +4340,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb);
* @list: list of skbs to process. Must not be shareable (e.g. it may
* be on the stack)
*
- * For now, just calls netif_receive_skb() in a loop, ignoring the
- * return value.
+ * Since return value of netif_receive_skb() is normally ignored, and
+ * wouldn't be meaningful for a list, this function returns void.
*
* This function may only be called from softirq context and interrupts
* should be enabled.
@@ -4309,8 +4352,7 @@ void netif_receive_skb_list(struct sk_buff_head *list)
skb_queue_for_each(skb, list)
trace_netif_receive_skb_list_entry(skb);
- while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
- netif_receive_skb_internal(skb);
+ netif_receive_skb_list_internal(list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb_list);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 13:33 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] Handle multiple received packets at each stage Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:34 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/8] net: core: trivial netif_receive_skb_list() entry point Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/8] sfc: batch up RX delivery on EF10 Edward Cree
2016-04-19 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 16:36 ` Edward Cree
2016-04-19 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 17:42 ` Edward Cree
2016-04-19 18:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/8] net: core: unwrap skb list receive slightly further Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:35 ` Edward Cree [this message]
2016-04-19 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/8] net: core: another layer of lists, around PF_MEMALLOC skb handling Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/8] net: core: propagate SKB lists through packet_type lookup Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: ipv4: listified version of ip_rcv Edward Cree
2016-04-19 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 15:46 ` Tom Herbert
2016-04-19 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 17:12 ` Edward Cree
2016-04-19 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 18:38 ` Tom Herbert
2016-04-19 16:50 ` Edward Cree
2016-04-19 18:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-21 17:24 ` Edward Cree
2016-04-19 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] net: ipv4: listify ip_rcv_finish Edward Cree
2016-04-19 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] Handle multiple received packets at each stage Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57163437.2060002@solarflare.com \
--to=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.