All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] core/pkg-kconfig: Use olddefconfig when available
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:24:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5716B01B.1000706@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160419203522.GD3505@free.fr>

On 04/19/16 22:35, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Romain, All,
>
> On 2016-04-19 19:45 +0200, Yann E. MORIN spake thusly:
>> On 2016-04-19 17:07 +0200, Romain Izard spake thusly:
>>> Using 'yes "" | make oldconfig' to regenerate a .config file from an
>>> existing defconfig does not work reliably in all cases. Specifically, it
>>> does not work well with tristate choice entries.
>>>
>>> The correct way to do it is to use 'make olddefconfig', but this target
>>> is not supported in projects that use an old version of kconfig. As
>>> most projects do not use tristate entries, there is no need for them to
>>> upgrade.
>>>
>>> 'oldnoconfig' is an alias for 'olddefconfig', but it also is the only
>>> name for this target between Linux versions 2.6.36 and 3.6.
>>>
>>> Check which targets are supported by the current project, and use the
>>> appropriate method to regenerate the .config file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v1: New patch
>>> v2: Use oldnoconfig instead of olddefconfig
>>>      Fix silent mode
>>>      Change the pattern in both places where it is used
>>>      Use a macro to avoid redundancy
>>> v3: Do not use $(call ...)
>>>      Use the $(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE variable
>>> v4: No change
>>> v5: Detect available methods and use the most recent one
>>>
>>>   package/pkg-kconfig.mk | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/package/pkg-kconfig.mk b/package/pkg-kconfig.mk
>>> index 4033915..e14b33f 100644
>>> --- a/package/pkg-kconfig.mk
>>> +++ b/package/pkg-kconfig.mk
>>> @@ -60,18 +60,35 @@ $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FILE) $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FRAGMENT_FILES): | $(1)-patch
>>>   $(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE = \
>>>   	$$($(2)_MAKE_ENV) $$(MAKE) -C $$($(2)_DIR) $$($(2)_KCONFIG_OPTS)
>>>
>>> +$(2)_KCONFIG_RULES = \
>>> +	$$(shell $$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) -pn config 2>/dev/null | \
>>> +		sed 's/^\([_0-9a-zA-Z]*config:\).*/\1/ p; d')
>>
>> NAK, because this will be executed at the time the package rules are
>> exapnded (i.e. during the call to $(eval $(kconfig-package)), so would
>> not work for a build from scratch...
>>
>> (but double-dollar make that assertion difficult to asses... I'd have to
>> double-check).
>
> OK, so I withdraw that comment: it *does* work. And the second shell
> eval is only called when needed! :-)
>
> Still, I'm not too fond of it being written in Makefile. Especially the
> part below...
>
>> Besides...
>>
>>> +# The correct way to regenerate a .config file is to use 'make olddefconfig'.
>>> +# For historical reasons, the target name is 'oldnoconfig' between Linux kernel
>>> +# versions 2.6.36 and 3.6, and remains as an alias in later versions.
>>> +# In older versions, and in some other projects that use kconfig, the target is
>>> +# not supported at all, and we use 'yes "" | make oldconfig' as a fallback
>>> +# only, as this can fail in complex cases.
>>> +define $(2)_REGEN_DOT_CONFIG
>>> +	$$(if $$(filter olddefconfig:,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_RULES)),
>>> +		$$(Q)$$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) olddefconfig,
>>> +		$$(if $$(filter oldnoconfig:,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_RULES)),
>>> +			$$(Q)$$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) oldnoconfig,
>>> +			$$(Q)(yes "" | $$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) oldconfig)))
>>> +endef
>
> I am not usually one to argue against writting Makefile code in a
> Makefile. However, for this case, I think writting a shell rule is much
> more readable.

  +1 to that.

  And as Thomas said: my Rev-by no longer applies.

  Regards,
  Arnout

>
> And I don't see how your solution would be inherently different from
> mine: both use 'make -pqn' to get the list of targets and grep/sed the
> output to decide if the requested target exists...
>
> By the way, if your sed expression would have moved the colon ':'
> outside the ()-expression, you would not have had to repeqt the colon in
> the filter match. Also, using extended regexps would allow using
> character classes.
>
>      $(2)_KCONFIG_RULES = \
>          $$(shell $$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) -pn config 2>/dev/null | \
>              sed -r '/^([[:alnum:]]*config):.*/!d; s//\1/;')
>
> Again, I think a shell construct is either to read.
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
>>>   # The specified source configuration file and any additional configuration file
>>>   # fragments are merged together to .config, after the package has been patched.
>>>   # Since the file could be a defconfig file it needs to be expanded to a
>>> -# full .config first. We use 'make oldconfig' because this can be safely
>>> -# done even when the package does not support defconfigs.
>>> +# full .config first.
>>>   $$($(2)_DIR)/.config: $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FILE) $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FRAGMENT_FILES)
>>>   	$$(Q)$$(if $$($(2)_KCONFIG_DEFCONFIG), \
>>>   		$$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) $$($(2)_KCONFIG_DEFCONFIG), \
>>>   		cp $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FILE) $$(@))
>>>   	$$(Q)support/kconfig/merge_config.sh -m -O $$(@D) \
>>>   		$$(@) $$($(2)_KCONFIG_FRAGMENT_FILES)
>>> -	$$(Q)yes "" | $$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) oldconfig
>>> +	$$($(2)_REGEN_DOT_CONFIG)
>>>
>>>   # If _KCONFIG_FILE or _KCONFIG_FRAGMENT_FILES exists, this dependency is
>>>   # already implied, but if we only have a _KCONFIG_DEFCONFIG we have to add
>>> @@ -82,7 +99,7 @@ $$($(2)_DIR)/.config: | $(1)-patch
>>>   # The exact rules are specified by the package .mk file.
>>>   define $(2)_FIXUP_DOT_CONFIG
>>>   	$$($(2)_KCONFIG_FIXUP_CMDS)
>>> -	$$(Q)yes "" | $$($(2)_KCONFIG_MAKE) oldconfig
>>> +	$$($(2)_REGEN_DOT_CONFIG)
>>>   	$$(Q)touch $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_kconfig_fixup_done
>>>   endef
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.5.0
>>>
>>
>> --
>> .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
>> |  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
>> | +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
>> | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
>> | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
>> '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot at busybox.net
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19 15:07 [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] core/pkg-kconfig: Use olddefconfig when available Romain Izard
2016-04-19 17:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-19 17:45 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-04-19 20:35   ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-04-19 22:24     ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2016-04-19 20:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-19 20:57 ` Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5716B01B.1000706@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.