Re: New messages in OSD logs.

[Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>]

On 20-4-2016 10:47, Erwan Velu wrote:
> I have the exact same trace while running a test on teuthology.

And I guess you are not running FreeBSD... :)
Teuthology would certainly not.


Does you test also ends in error?

--WjW

> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Willem Jan Withagen" <wjw@digiware.nl>
> À: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
> Envoyé: Samedi 16 Avril 2016 13:07:10
> Objet: New messages in OSD logs.
> 
> Hi
> 
> I've recently rebased my fork, and also upgrae FreeBSD to more recent code.
> Now I'm running into this:
> 
> 2016-04-16 03:03:55.891466 805617000 -1
> filestore(testdir/test-erasure-eio/0) WARNING: max attr value size (1024)
> is smaller than osd_max_object_name_len (2048). Your backend filesystem
> appears to not support attrs large enough
> to handle the configured max rados name size. You may get unexpected
> ENAMETOOLONG errors on rados operations or buggy behavior
> 
> and later on:
> 
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287073 805617000  2 osd.0 0 boot
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287846 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 backend (filestore) is 
> unable to support max object name[space] le
> n
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287873 805617000 -1 osd.0 0    osd max object name 
> len = 2048
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287894 805617000 -1 osd.0 0    osd max object 
> namespace len = 256
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287931 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 (63) File name too long
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.303432 805617000  1 journal close 
> testdir/test-erasure-eio/0/journal
> 2016-04-16 03:04:03.310280 805617000 -1 ^[[0;31m ** ERROR: osd init 
> failed: (63) File name too long^[[0m
> 
> And the OSD dies....
> 
> I guess that this has the do with the changes in the LFN modules, and is 
> also the reason for the debate about ext4 support.
> 
> Uptill now unittest_chain_xattr did work, but that now also fails.
> But it fails in a strange way where it tries to delete attributes with 
> numerical ends that are certainly not in the attributes.
> Maximum xattr name length in FreeBSD seems to be 256 chars, which wasn't 
> a problem yet.
> 
> So is there any chance of continuing on my "old" way to finish a first 
> version of the port?
> 
> Or am I just seeing things, and should I start looking at the FreeBSD 
> side of things?
> 
> 
> Thanx,
> --WjW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html