From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: Regression in next for smsc911x with tigthen lockdep checks Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:22:49 +0200 Message-ID: <57179EC9.6000505@stressinduktion.org> References: <20160420150108.GF5995@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160420150108.GF5995@atomide.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren , "David S. Miller" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 20.04.2016 17:01, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Looks like commit fafc4e1ea1a4 ("sock: tigthen lockdep checks for > sock_owned_by_user") in next causes a regression at least for > smsc911x with CONFIG_LOCKDEP. It keeps spamming with the following > message. Any ideas? Not yet, can you quickly send me your config? Thanks, Hannes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hannes@stressinduktion.org (Hannes Frederic Sowa) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:22:49 +0200 Subject: Regression in next for smsc911x with tigthen lockdep checks In-Reply-To: <20160420150108.GF5995@atomide.com> References: <20160420150108.GF5995@atomide.com> Message-ID: <57179EC9.6000505@stressinduktion.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 20.04.2016 17:01, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Looks like commit fafc4e1ea1a4 ("sock: tigthen lockdep checks for > sock_owned_by_user") in next causes a regression at least for > smsc911x with CONFIG_LOCKDEP. It keeps spamming with the following > message. Any ideas? Not yet, can you quickly send me your config? Thanks, Hannes