From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:34289 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751851AbcDUSuE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:50:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next 1/4] ieee802154: atusb: implement .set_csma_params ops callback References: <1461076135-31540-1-git-send-email-stefan@osg.samsung.com> <5718A4DB.3010300@osg.samsung.com> From: Stefan Schmidt Message-ID: <571920D7.6000502@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:49:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5718A4DB.3010300@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Aring , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 21/04/16 12:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 20/04/16 20:55, Alexander Aring wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 04/19/2016 04:28 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> Catching up with the stack here and implement CSMA parameter setting. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt >> all patches are fine. I want to remember this settings have no effects >> until atusb has TX_ARET support and drops basic operation mode. >> >> But I am sure you already known that and this will part of next firmware >> version. > > Yes, thats what I'm working on right now. > >> Also please care of ed-levels if they are the same on at86rf230, don't >> known yet. There is some calculation with rssi_base_val parameter which >> is on 2.4 Ghz always -91. > > I will have a look at the 230 ed level table and see if anything > special is needed for it when running atusb with the rzusb dongle. I looked it up in the datasheets (231 on page 91ff and for 230 page 50ff). Both have 85 ED levels in 1dB steps and the range is 0 - 84 on both as well. Nothing I can see where 230 and 231 have any difference how we would need to handle them. regards Stefan Schmidt