From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ptmx.org (ptmx.org [178.63.28.110]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE816E668 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.1.4] (62-178-118-86.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [62.178.118.86]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBE80237B9 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:14:57 +0200 (CEST) To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: Carlos Rafael Giani Message-ID: <571DFC30.10003@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:14:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: base_ , oe.utils , bb.utils confusion X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:15:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I've noticed that the base_* functions have been compatibility wrappers for a while now. What is confusing though is that some of the replacements are in bb.utils , others in oe.utils. For example, base_contains becomes bb.utils.contains, while base_conditional becomes oe.utils.conditional. Is there any reason for this difference?