From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f67.google.com ([209.85.220.67]:34930 "EHLO mail-pa0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932139AbcDYMeo (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:34:44 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id zy2so18018509pac.2 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 05:34:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yxP7l9zwqU0rNIlzdOMOb5eQdmWIXcZ8rVg1ib85wWg=; b=WzdJ83B79eztSIbdbrwr715+7uWsUbNBqoLCT7+QYmZuRRLD9eQ9W2JDyins4sgrtz Mcdw5GxzcHfCsOC5dPDJD6dBt2htewhfWDdP0gHUI4r51EJ/6swnLTZ77o0BKfbWY7MF oBfcPwitpasWwvCXjxtW3XQoO6vY7aHI0Jy3dAARV/9IQsOefUUy3zR/FweSsfkAvBCI qxJTPT85JVprJfUggff6lGWS+cH8KP96mr2jE2DIoVqF1MwmoC/CEVP90CeRHrBJrZmE Tnro2QS2HmKFJZ+3xOagc4CZB3QaVXNFAJkNWJkdfC8mFKF/8BnYHus71vV4tYzr4arr Smow== Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links References: <571C1843.1060906@gmail.com> <571C1C8F.9000602@gmail.com> <571C42A1.8060201@gmail.com> <571C6CBB.4080101@gmail.com> <571CD6E7.4060301@gmail.com> <20160424175701.GU3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <571D4684.2030007@gmail.com> <20160424224808.GX3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Akira Yokosawa Message-ID: <571E0EDE.8030603@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:34:38 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160424224808.GX3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa On 2016/04/24 15:48:08 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:19:48AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >> On 2016/04/24 10:57:01 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:23:35PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> There was no change in the behavior. >>> >>> Ah, that would explain the lack of complaints. Most people reading >>> the book on a mobile device use perfbook-1c.pdf, so the chapter >>> links would work nicely for them. >> >> Then, wouldn't it be nicer if we change the default target in Makefile >> to perfbook-1c.pdf ? >> >> Or how about just adding a shorter name target such as "1c" that would >> build perfbook-1c.pdf ? >> >> Of course, we should be careful enough not to annoy people by a >> sudden change of behavior. > > I prefer the double-column layout because it takes less paper to print. I see. You have the final say. > But having "make 1c" create the single-column layout would be fine. I'll see what I can do in this direction. Thanks, Akira > > Thanx, Paul > >>>> I'm very glad I can contribute the perfbook project in this manner. >>>> >>>> So far, patches I submitted were mostly cosmetic changes. >>>> I'm planning to submit something that touches the actual contents, too. >>>> But don't expect too much. >>> >>> Cosmetic it might be, but I believe that readers will appreciate it >>> very much! Thank you again! >>> >>> Thanx, Paul >>> >>> >> > >