From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:43:37 +0200 Message-ID: <571F0009.3080903@suse.de> References: <571DF852.6030604@redhat.com> <571E0E7A.4050703@redhat.com> <20160425173838.GE26117@octiron.msp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160425173838.GE26117@octiron.msp.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: >> Hi, >> Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be remove= d not >> to confuse distributors. >> Distributors can't be asked to agree on a common udev ruleset. Ben, >> Hannes, Xos=E9, Peter are you ok with my deleting the udev rules exam= ple ? > = > I am personally fine with kpartx.rules being deleted. Red Hat doesn't > package it. > = Well, we do. We use kpartx to generate partitions for multipath and dmraid, so we do need this rule. Please do not delete it; if so I will only have to re-add it again in a SUSE-specific patch. Cheers, Hannes -- = Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: F. Imend=F6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg)