From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571F295A.6060607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571F0009.3080903@suse.de>
On 26.4.2016 07:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be removed not
>>> to confuse distributors.
>>> Distributors can't be asked to agree on a common udev ruleset. Ben,
>>> Hannes, Xosé, Peter are you ok with my deleting the udev rules example ?
>>
>> I am personally fine with kpartx.rules being deleted. Red Hat doesn't
>> package it.
>>
> Well, we do. We use kpartx to generate partitions for multipath and
> dmraid, so we do need this rule.
> Please do not delete it; if so I will only have to re-add it again
> in a SUSE-specific patch.
Hi
Can you please elaborate what is the 'specific' need of SUSE for patch?
AFAIK there should be no need for it - all identifiers are not tracked by
10-dm.rules
It has whole logic about device state built-in.
So what exactly would you need to trace in kpartx.rules ?
Regards
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 10:52 multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules Peter Volkov
2016-04-25 10:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-04-25 12:10 ` Peter Volkov
2016-04-25 12:32 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-04-25 12:52 ` Peter Volkov
2016-04-25 12:56 ` Christophe Varoqui
2016-04-25 14:15 ` Peter Volkov
2016-04-25 17:38 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-04-26 5:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-26 8:39 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2016-04-26 8:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-26 9:19 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-04-25 20:14 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2016-04-26 5:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-27 22:46 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-04-28 6:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-28 22:10 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-05-11 18:46 ` Distributions mpt code Xose Vazquez Perez
2016-04-28 22:45 ` multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules Benjamin Marzinski
2016-05-19 15:24 ` multipath-tools: irrelevant files Xose Vazquez Perez
2016-06-01 15:05 ` Christophe Varoqui
2016-06-04 0:14 ` multipath-tools: web Xose Vazquez Perez
2016-04-25 15:04 ` multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571F295A.6060607@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.