From: Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] getrusage04 on ARM fails sometimes
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:51:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571F3A23.6070202@laposte.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160425144643.GC20158@rei.lan>
Hi,
We are wondering if other people have issues with getrusage04 LTP test.
We see it failing sometimes on our ARM platform.
It seems to happen most often when CONFIG_HZ=300 than when CONFIG_HZ=100.
When the test was introduced (https://sourceforge.net/p/ltp/mailman/message/27853271/) it did not support the "-m" parameter, which is meant to broaden the "acceptance" interval.
The "-m" parameter was added by people from ST (fd875256d6f99102e3940c4dfc6b0a8a27f4d62c), so presumably working on embedded (probably ARM) systems.
Some people are increasing that interval (https://ez.analog.com/docs/DOC-9111).
Also, according to the commit history, the test is disabled on QEMU, Xen and other environments.
Questions:
1) Does anybody else using ARM has issues with this test? Or is it just us?
2) Do you suggest that we increase the "-m" parameter?
3) Do you know of another test that could be used to double check that getrusage04 failure is a false positive?
Thanks, regards,
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 13:25 [LTP] Issue with the reporting of failed tests Mason
2016-04-21 14:47 ` Mason
2016-04-21 15:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-21 15:42 ` Mason
2016-04-21 17:02 ` Mason
2016-04-21 18:59 ` Mason
2016-04-22 13:29 ` Mason
2016-04-25 8:04 ` Mason
2016-04-25 11:40 ` Mason
2016-04-25 12:46 ` Mason
2016-04-25 13:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-25 14:24 ` Mason
2016-04-25 14:46 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-26 9:51 ` Sebastian Frias [this message]
2016-04-25 13:04 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571F3A23.6070202@laposte.net \
--to=sf84@laposte.net \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.